if he called you a cheat, just report the person on the 'Report Abuse' button on the bottom of the page. No need to post here.
After this game I was accused of cheating!
Sort:
I wanted to showcase the game as well. I don't really care that I was accused of cheating.
May 9, 2009
0
#4
Thanks for posting. Some nice moves there. Did he resign or you won on time?
He resigned.
May 9, 2009
0
#6
Well it's obvious. Anyone who can spot a skewer must be getting assistance from a supercomputer :-).
Nice game - like a pro (except for the quality of the opponent).
You would need to have deep blue level calculation skills to spot that skewer... I'm not surprised he called me out.
May 9, 2009
0
#8
i was once accused of cheating by alteration of time.
and that was actually due to the time lag here at live chess.
May 9, 2009
0
#9
Your opponent is at fault for resigning so early, book preparation is nothing. It's the moves out of book at should be considered, and technically each side still has 4 pieces to work with. Even if he's an exchange down he should have tried to fight harder instead of just resigning so early. I've won and drawn games before where i screwed up on a book opening but continued to play on until the very end.
He didn't screw up a book opening, he messed up tactically and lost the exchange.
He was also about to lose more material, at least a pawn I think.
May 9, 2009
0
#11
You both missed hung pawns and had some chances. The game was even for quite a bit. Not cheating just a good game.
please remember there is no "meat" in cheat, but there is something to "eat"....please think about that for a while and then you will "get it", like seeing a thunderbolt light up the night sky.....but i digress.........
Keyif wrote:
You both missed hung pawns and had some chances. The game was even for quite a bit. Not cheating just a good game.
Which hung pawns?
Kupov wrote:
Keyif wrote:
You both missed hung pawns and had some chances. The game was even for quite a bit. Not cheating just a good game.
Which hung pawns?
good question. maybe he talks about where you moved rook to c1 to threathen queen before taking the pawn and did not realize it did not matter if you took pawn there or next move. who knows
Keyif is probably referring to the E pawn after whites 5. 0-0, but that pawn is not really hung after Rook E1, and there are some other valid continuations for white.
May 10, 2009
0
#16
good game and dont see any reason for the accusation. there was still a lot of chess to play. why resign?!!!
I would have resigned in his position to be honest.
First 15 moves are book moves.
16.b3 = 1st engine's choice
17.Bb2 = 3rd engine's choice
18.Rc1 (clear unforced move) = 3rd engine's choice
19.Bxd4 = 3rd engine's choice
20.Ng3 = 1st engine's choice
21.Qe2 = 3rd engine's choice
22-24 = forced moves
25.Qb5 = 3rd engine's choice
In 10 moves (from 15 to 25) Black has 2 mistakes and 3 inexactities, White has no mistakes, no inexactities.
I don't know and I don't care if you did cheat or not in that game, but you should have an 1800 OTB rating to play so good.
The computer analysis on this site says that I made a few inexactities.
My live chess rating (which I consider similar to OTB, though I have never actually played in a rated OTB event) is 1570 right now, but I assume that I will break into the 1600 bracket this week.
The computer also gives me a + .50 advantage after move 20, but a - .30 earlier in the game.
At the point where my opponent resigned the computer gives me a nearly 4.00 advantage.
It's nice of you to say that I play like an 1800 otber though :)
So I played this game today in live chess against an opponent of about my strength and after I won he said "bleach I'm going to report you cheater".
I was actually quite flattered, so here is the game, played fully by myself, with no books or computers.
The time controls were 20 minutes with no increment.
As always constructive criticism and analysis is very welcome. Thanks in advance.