Keep Your Queen Carefully

Sort:
Borneo_Chess

Keep your queen carefully & Don't use the facilities "premoves" carelessly. If you lose your queen early on, then I'll beat you easily because I was an expert in a mating net.

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=647732190


 

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=645989463

toiyabe

Congratulations, I award you the trophy for "Most Pointless Chess Game ever shown on chess.com".  

thelonerangers

4...b5 

Borneo_Chess
scorch1994 wrote:

Wouldn't most people beat their opponents easily if they drop their queen in the first few moves with little to no compensation?

I'm not stressed to the loss of the queen, but rather emphasizes the advantages of using techniques to demonstrate the skills to make checkmate patterns. Yes, It's not always as simple as you think. Check out one more :

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=649882139



http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=649961218

Borneo_Chess
scorch1994 wrote:

Again, your opponent just dropped the queen and so you had a significant advantage from there on. From that position it's a fairly simple matter to force checkmate in a mating pattern using your material advantage. Your opponent might as well have resigned once they blundered their queen. Showing the mating pattern that you crafting using such a huge advantage isn't really all that educational when you already have such an advantageous position. A more telling demonstration of your skill would be a showcase of a mating pattern/attack that wins by virtue of the intrinsic strength of the attack rather than by virtue of an overwhelming amount of material due to an early queen blunder by your opponent. That's just my opinion though.

When your opponent just dropped the queen and so you had a significant advantage from there on. I realize that it's a fairly simple matter to force checkmate in a mating pattern using your material advantage. Will you showing me the mating pattern that you crafting using such a huge advantage by your own game, so I will know that you can do the same. Smile

Borneo_Chess
scorch1994 wrote:

Usually my opponents don't drop their queens and if they do they normally resign quickly so there's no mating pattern needed but here's one where my opponent dropped a knight and it spiraled down from there.

 

http://www.chess.com/echess/game?id=79145978

 

However, something I find more impressive than that is a situation where the attack was built up without a material advantage, or even at the expense of conceding a material disadvantage, with the hope or knowledge that there will be compensation (sometimes when it's unclear that there will be).

 

An example:

http://www.chess.com/echess/game?id=78171470

 

I guess it's a matter of opinion though. Some people just like seeing an obvious blunder be punished I suppose. Regardless, you have some nice mating patterns there, I just think it'd be even more impressive if you showcased something where you mate your opponent without having such a material advantage.

http://www.chess.com/echess/game?id=79145978


http://www.chess.com/echess/game?id=78171470

Note:
By the way, I wanna to see how you make the checkmate pattern when your opponent dropping their queen without compensation. You must to do everything in lightning (One Minute Game) as mine, but not in the online chess that very prone to cheating by using an engine.

Borneo_Chess
harryz wrote:

Any titled player would resign when they blunder their queen. Heck, I resign when I blunder a minor piece

 
You see, my opponent didn't deign to give up, maybe he realized that it was a bullet that he still hoped to win on time. However, he was wrong, because I have skill and experience to make a checkmate patterns.

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=650214920


 

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=650231963

Borneo_Chess

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=654958504

Borneo_Chess

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=654963983

Borneo_Chess

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=655008596

Scottrf

Here's my mating pattern to help show that queens are better than minor pieces:


Next lesson: Pieces are better than pawns.

Bartleby73

love your humor, scottrf!

Borneo_Chess
Scottrf wrote:

Here's my mating pattern to help show that queens are better than minor pieces:

Next lesson: Pieces are better than pawns.

The case of queen loss that featured in your game should not need to happen because it is played in a long time allocations. This is different from what I show as it happens in 1 minute chess (lightning or bullet). However, I still appreciate the effort you display a similar case. Thanks,-

Scottrf

More to learn from a queen trap than a dodgy premove IMO but OK.

Borneo_Chess
Scottrf wrote:

More to learn from a queen trap than a dodgy premove IMO but OK.

Getting a free queen is very advantageous, but I emphasize here is your ability to make a mating pattern within 1 minute after you get the advantage. It is an art and the uniqueness of the bullet. Are you ready to accept the challenge of playing a bullet?

By the way,
If you play blitz, standard, as well as online chess, you have a chance to think much longer so that you are able to show the game accurately. But the availability of a lot of time, causing the type of those games are more prone to cheating by using the engine. Instead, it is more difficult to happen in the game lightning (1 minute).

Borneo_Chess

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=655039677

Borneo_Chess

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=679274445

Borneo_Chess

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=679393098

Borneo_Chess

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=748814189

Borneo_Chess

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=868351455