not a showcase

like the subject notes, i do not have the intent of showcasing this game. i am an 18 year old, and i love the game of chess. i started playing mid january and ive struggled with the game of chess more then most games ive played. ive recently begun to become quite skilled at understand strategic concepts and memorizing variations, along with understanding there justifications. like i have mentioned previously, i do not indend on showcasing the game, i just felt like i had a good game and i wanted some input on anything the analyst see's relevant. the match was against a 1630 elo rated opponent on the playchess.com sever. the game was a 5 minute match considered to be a blitz match. any observation and critical questioning is expected. the game may be objectively a really shitty game, i dont know SO JUST TELL ME WHAT YOU THINK. i played as white.

1.c4 Nf6 2.Nc3 g6 3.g3 Bg7 4.Bg2 c6 5.e4 O-O 6.Nge2 e5 7.d4 exd4 8.Qxd4 d5 9.exd5 Nxd5 10.Qh4 Qxh4 11.gxh4 Nxc3 12.Nxc3 Re8 13.Be3 Na6 14.a3 Nc5 15.O-O Ne6 16.Rfd1 h6 17.Rab1 Kh7 18.b4 Bf6 19.h5 gxh5 20.Be4 Kg7 21.b5 Bxc3 22.bxc6 bxc6 23.Bxc6 Ba6 24.Bxe8 Rxe8 25.c5 Ng5 26.Rd7 Be2 27.c6 Bf3 28.Rbb7 Bxc6

obviously 28. rbb7?? was a mistake and a move based on having to guess my opponents move considered i had approxmately .7 seconds left at that time. the game ended Bxc6 due to my avaliable time ceasing to exist. obvioulsly 28. rbb7 was not a good move, but even considering this final position, i still felt some winning chances. i would have most likely continued with 30. rxa7 Bxd7 31. Rxd7 assuming that my opponent would have played along. he could either exchange a bishop for a rook which seemed to be his motive when splitting the rooks, although he could have attempted to put me in check with 30...nh3 although his attack is weak and wouldnt last long. i could see following the g5 knights movement multiple times, that Bd4+ with the obviouse intent of exchanging bishops seems fair. or even better yet, checking the black king with  Bd4+ following the g5 knights movement  and the c3 bishops movement. although i would most likely play with the state of mind that each of my opponents moves is becoming more and more of a disadvantage rather than an advantage, and subsequential most likely would play more timid that the former expressed exchanges. i did see a little chance for a pawn promotion, but who knows. im posting this for others input, not to have you listen to mine. any critique and observation are expected and wanted, not only for the following endgame but the entire game.

if the game position didnt get inserted (i dont know why it wouldnt, the process seemed confusing and i cant see the game i asked to be displayed) then this is a link to a game explorer of the final position.

http://www.chess.com/explorer/index.html?id=3796773&ply=56&black=0

Here is your game.

haha, thank you. say something about it though.

8. nxd4 makes sense although i feel that 8. qxd4 gives a chance to allow the queen to develop with no black piece having the ability to immediately threaten it. i also feel that following 8. qxd4 my opponent almost immediately stopped developing his pieces, and instead focused on an unnatural attempt to threaten the queen. so i feel that 8. qxd4 in itself gave me around 6 moves of midgame positional development such as the short castle and rook positioning.

You can lead a horse to water but you can't make em drink...

Undermining your center and coincidentally attacking your queen in the process didn't look too unnatural to me.

so i analyzed this game replacing 28. rbb7 with 28. c7 and not only does white have a constant advantage. but also has brilliant moves to be made, and wins.