Sicilian Defence : Anangle Variation

Hello friends ! I present before you what I call the Anangle Variation of the sicilian defense , so because in this variation , if black wants to keep an Anangle flavour , he has to move his bishop in the shape forming "An angle".  

                                                   Do share your thoughts on this opening.

I think Kupreichik had you beat to this idea. Also, 6 Bg5 and 6 f3 are probably critical, no?

"(7. Bxf6gxf6followed by h5 and Bh6 is good for black. )"

That's nice in theory, but what happens if I stick my Queen on h5?

Not directly Bh6 , but after some preparations.

Nc6 maybe...

oh! didn't know. But the anangular manuoere is my idea anyway..

No games of carlsen are in Megadatabase 2018 too.

sorry for my ignorance

Anyway! Carlsen's 7.Nc6  was not in the spirit of this opening .In MY analysis above , after 6.Be2 , black reserved the c6 square for his bishop.

...............and the Anangular bishop finally perished without a part in the fight.

lol

I don't know who Van Den Dah is, but probably not a good day for him if even I can spot several glaring errors (the engine backs me up, which basically never happens when I dislike a GM's move heh).

You give 21...Re5 an exclaim, I think it's meh. 22.c4 is obviously bad, and 22...a5 should get the exclaim.

23.a3 is completely silly.

yep!

I have used this variation to beat my first titled (FM) player on internet - ANANGULAR TRIUMPH !!!

I used this opening i saw here in a game and here is the result:

PS: There are lots of mistakes (i will check with engine and say in a few minutes) i think, but overall it was a decent game in my opinion. Pls say what you think about it.