The Chinese gambit
Sort:
C_A_T_S_C_H_E_S_S
Apr 8, 2025
0
#1
Apr 8, 2025
0
#2
The idea is that you sacrifice the queen to move your rook to the open file, in order to deliver a checkmate, but this gambit also depends on a bit of luck, so you can’t rely on this too much. I think that housing this gambit against 100-1000 ELO players would be best.
Apr 8, 2025
0
#3
This opening starts with scotch opening, to develop your pieces and to lure white out of safety, also, this gambit has only worked for black, but I will try for white as well.
Apr 8, 2025
0
#4
There IS the Chinese Gambit for white, but it takes MUCH longer to do, and probably won’t work on players with more than 100-800 ELO…
P.S. this gambit is entirely made up by me, and not official, but is still effective
C_A_T_S_C_H_E_S_S wrote:
The idea is that you sacrifice the queen to move your rook to the open file, in order to deliver a checkmate,
Fun fact: you did not sacrifice the queen.
Apr 10, 2025
0
#6
I meant to let the opponent take the queen, to mobilize the rook.
Apr 13, 2025
0
#8
Why would white blunder mate there? It seems really simple to play Bxc6 or h3
Apr 14, 2025
0
#10
SacrifycedStoat wrote:
Why would white blunder mate there? It seems really simple to play Bxc6 or h3
Because even if they didn’t blunder, it would have still been a losing position for white, as long as black doesn’t suddenly become an idiot.
4.Nxe5 and your position isn't exactly promising. No?
Mazetoskylo wrote:
4.Nxe5 and your position isn't exactly promising. No?
What? Obviously, thatd blunder a knight
maxwell4114 έγραψε:
Mazetoskylo wrote:
4.Nxe5 and your position isn't exactly promising. No?
What? Obviously, thatd blunder a knight
Which knight it would blunder? Mike Knight probably?
pfren wrote:
maxwell4114 έγραψε:
Mazetoskylo wrote:
4.Nxe5 and your position isn't exactly promising. No?
What? Obviously, thatd blunder a knight
Which knight it would blunder? Mike Knight probably?
oh, shoot, you're right, it wouldn't blunder one, my mistake
Bxf7+, but what does that have to relate to anything
Mathnerd2015 wrote:
Why are y’all hating on Chinese players
What? How are we hating on chinese players?
23 days ago
0
#19
It’s not a gambit since it’s doesn’t sacrifice any material.
At the end, of white moves the knight to a sensible position, like d2, it wouldn’t be that bad
At the end, of white moves the knight to a sensible position, like d2, it wouldn’t be that bad
SacrifycedStoat wrote:
It’s not a gambit since it’s doesn’t sacrifice any material.
At the end, of white moves the knight to a sensible position, like d2, it wouldn’t be that bad
At the end, of white moves the knight to a sensible position, like d2, it wouldn’t be that bad
I've made this point before that the "Grob gambit with 2. Bg2" is not a gambit, despite having gambit in the name, so to be called a "gambit" the opening does not need to be classified as a gambit