The Shortest Stalemate
these bizarre moves made by both players at the Swedish Junior Championship 1995, it looks like they had all of the moves planned beforehand..
The Shortest Stalemate.
Sort:
Nice. They should get a prize for this beautiful composition.
#4.......he does not play RxQ because ? It was a prank......
Yeah, they should..
eddysallin wrote:
#4.......he does not play RxQ because ? It was a prank......
it was tremendously beautiful prank.
Black really trusted his opponent, it if was a championship game I bet most people playing white would have broken the agreement at move 10 :P
Ayoubi-W wrote:
eddysallin wrote:
#4.......he does not play RxQ because ? It was a prank......
it was tremendously beautiful prank.
it was a tremendously awesome beautiful prank.
plutonia wrote:
Black really trusted his opponent, it if was a championship game I bet most people playing white would have broken the agreement at move 10 :P
LOL - instead of him I would break the agreement & checkmate him immediately.. this is championship game..!
Feb 1, 2013
0
#9
actually, they got a prize.
I don't remember the exact story, but I think they were friends and played each other. Perhaps one of them was going to win the tournament and needed only a draw to secure. So they agreed to a short draw. The refferees of the tournament disagreed and wanted them to have another match. So they played this game (which btw was invented a long time ago by someone else as the shortest possible stalemate). The result of the game was due to the referees.... 0-0.
for more information search the game on chessgames.com and read the discussion there.
senor_ananas wrote:
actually, they got a prize.
I don't remember the exact story, but I think they were friends and played each other. Perhaps one of them was going to win the tournament and needed only a draw to secure. So they agreed to a short draw. The refferees of the tournament disagreed and wanted them to have another match. So they played this game (which btw was invented a long time ago by someone else as the shortest possible stalemate). The result of the game was due to the referees.... 0-0.
for more information search the game on chessgames.com and read the discussion there.
thanks mate, thank you for discussion & clarification..
Feb 2, 2013
0
#11
Here's a variation: http://www.chess.com/article/view/the-shortest-stalemate-possible?page=2
As a puzzle or a study ,sure. But to agree not to play your best in a tourn. is a chess charade.Were other players affected ? They should get a prize for a beautiful composition---yup. Problem, this is not forum for comps. or puzzles ...rather it's a chess tourn,
senor_ananas wrote:
So they played this game (which btw was invented a long time ago by someone else as the shortest possible stalemate).
By Sam Loyd (if I'm remembering right).
ClavierCavalier wrote:
Here's a variation: http://www.chess.com/article/view/the-shortest-stalemate-possible?page=2
Well, I don't know which one is the correct game the link you posted shows the same stalemate with different moves!! so which one is the correct one ..?
eddysallin wrote:
#4.......he does not play RxQ because ? It was a prank......
yes, it's a prank.
hoynck wrote:
The shortest mutual stalemate!
Composed by Enzo Minerva
The fastest known game ending in a double stalemate position was discovered by Enzo Minerva and published in the Italian newspaper l'Unità on 14 August 2007
Cool, I haven't seen that before.
rooperi wrote:
hoynck wrote:
The shortest mutual stalemate!
Composed by Enzo Minerva
The fastest known game ending in a double stalemate position was discovered by Enzo Minerva and published in the Italian newspaper l'Unità on 14 August 2007
Cool, I haven't seen that before.
Yea, me too ;) thanks hoynck for sharing with us.. (Y)
senor_ananas wrote:
actually, they got a prize.
I don't remember the exact story, but I think they were friends and played each other. Perhaps one of them was going to win the tournament and needed only a draw to secure. So they agreed to a short draw. The refferees of the tournament disagreed and wanted them to have another match. So they played this game (which btw was invented a long time ago by someone else as the shortest possible stalemate). The result of the game was due to the referees.... 0-0.
for more information search the game on chessgames.com and read the discussion there.
They were friends and one needed only a draw to secure victory.Thats called cheating---if he needed only a draw that means another player had chances to move up. I hear complaints about a chess player beating G.M.s through use of tech., but here because a stale-mate beauty was agreed upon it's looked upon differently. It's a tourn. not a puzzle.Great role model for young chess players .
Thanks for the comment & feedback..
