Very Brilliant QUEEN Sacrifice!!!

Sort:
Avatar of 123AbdulM
TXBaseballFan wrote:

what about Bc6+ Nxc6 Qxc2. Black did not have to capture

Yes, I know Black did not have to capture but your line exchanges a Bishop for a rook. My line wins a rook for free.

Avatar of davdebrux

Thanks Franzdrake. Well here are the elements that i noticed before sacrificing:

1. Black king would be exposed (no pawn protection)

2. Possibility to bring all pieces towards the king for the kill (loads of lines opened) with this clear mindset: go forward

3. In the end, was sacrificing queen against rook, bishop and 1 pawn. So material is still balanced. I know this looks stupid, but that helped me a lot for taking the decision. 

Avatar of 1e4-2Nf3isbest

oh ok

 

Avatar of kJDG15
 

Source : https://youtu.be/4IQ44wuFLxE

Avatar of Rook_Handler

WOW. Just. WOW.

Avatar of roykoli

even i got queen sacrifice

Avatar of felixeijo

cold

Avatar of BOWTOTHETOAST
MajinGotan wrote:

This is the most brilliant move I ever made. A queen sacrifice that leads to a mate! Please post your queen sacrificed games if you have one.

I would have found this in 2 seconds of thought.

Avatar of BOWTOTHETOAST
davdebrux wrote:

Not sure if my queen sacrifice was very brilliant or even sound...Found out that it was a nice way to keep the pressure on black king and initiative. Let me know if you think i had a best way to continue the game. Found this idea at the 16th move of this game and decided to go for Qh5. I do not think my opponent found the best defense either.

That is nasty, just so nasty.

Avatar of blueemu
Avatar of Refrigerator321

I had an very nice queen sac yesterday but I lost the game

Avatar of Refrigerator321

Though today against Wally bot I got

Avatar of CamillaTuffin0727

SMOTHERED MATE omgggggg

Avatar of wngfc

Hung my rook for pressure on move 36

Avatar of CamillaTuffin0727

Avatar of emeraldo_splasho
Avatar of gik-tally

I feel like the OP's trying to express that they feel like they've grown as a player and exceeded limitations.

perhaps you're on your way to becoming a gambiteer

if you attack opponents hard enough, many of them crumble and many more miss threats and tactics.

I know a woman who's just starting to play again who's TERRIFIED of simply TRADING queens even though sometimes, ya gotta trade for a pawn to stay in the game, so I can see how your first queen sac can feel like a rush.

congrats

Avatar of Pzxchess

Does one I played in outside chess.com count? For example FIDE standard tournament?

Avatar of magipi
1983B-Boy wrote:

I feel like the OP's trying to express that they feel like they've grown as a player and exceeded limitations.

perhaps you're on your way to becoming a gambiteer

if you attack opponents hard enough, many of them crumble and many more miss threats and tactics.

I know a woman who's just starting to play again who's TERRIFIED of simply TRADING queens even though sometimes, ya gotta trade for a pawn to stay in the game, so I can see how your first queen sac can feel like a rush.

congrats

Your congratulating the guy 13 years after the game. Isn't that a bit too late? Especially considering that he stopped playing chess 11 years ago?

Avatar of Pzxchess

https://www.chess.com/game/live/73647024987