Forums

Wanna Play?

Sort:
RyanGarner

Hello Chess.com! I was asking if anyone wanted to challenge me! Here is my stats:

Standard
Current: 1014
Highest: 1200 (30 Jul 2011)
Avg. Opp.: 1044
Best Win: 1003 (wiqedfunk)
Today's Rank: #207600 of 246,350 (15.6%)
Total Games: 46
Won: 22 (48%)
Lost: 24 (52%)
Drawn: 0 (0%

 

       Please, NO OPPONENTS OVER 1020, If you do wish to challenge me, and is over the limit, PLEASE MAKE THE GAME UNRATED! Thanks!

RyanGarner

If you wish to challenge, or plan to send one, please post a comment here, it will help me discern which are practice matches through this forum. Thanks!

RyanGarner

Oh, yes, that will be fine!

KenF99

come on, don't be scared of ratings! Which do you think is the most important? 1.Getting better and better at chess by playing better players or 2.Playing similar-leveled people and scared that the rating will drop and not get better as quick as getting better while playing skilled players

Which will u choose as the more important?

KenF99

ratings are JUST numbers!

KenF99

doesn't tell much (i defeated a 1500 guy once in rated)

RyanGarner

People, I'm 1027 now. I've been getting better. Out of my last 10 games, its 6 wins/10 total. That is over half, which is considered good any day of the week, and twice on Sunday. Also, the first LIVE tournament I entered, I came in 2ed place.

KenF99

great to hear!

RyanGarner

UPDATE: my rating is now 1038. Thanks! :D

The_Gavinator

At the sub1300 level, the only thing you need to analyze is why you hang pieces so much.

RyanGarner

Are you suggesting that I hang piece a lot? 

Yeah, ChristianSoldier007, I already do that.

trysts
The_Gavinator wrote:

At the sub1300 level, the only thing you need to analyze is why you hang pieces so much.

I think that goes for the sub 1600 level as wellWink

RyanGarner

I know! I love looking over my games. It really helps me. I have gotten better about not hanging pieces, but sometimes slip up when too many things are going on at once. It happens to the best of us.

The_Gavinator

No I'd say 1300 is around the level on here where people start to know how to play... That's around 1200 USCF.

RyanGarner

Yeah, true.

trysts
The_Gavinator wrote:

No I'd say 1300 is around the level on here where people start to know how to play... That's around 1200 USCF.

To a 1600 player, 1300 doesn't really understand how to play yetLaughing

RyanGarner

Yeah. I've learned that you don't have to play a game in 10 minutes.

The_Gavinator

True, to a GM, a FM has no clue how to play

trysts
The_Gavinator wrote:

True, to a GM, a FM has no clue how to play

I played a former NM once, and his strength of play is almost immediately felt. The pressure is so different from  my level of opponent, and he made me feel quite helpless. The game was an example of holding on until the inevitable collapse of my position, while at the same time I had zero chances, that I could see, in attacking his position. 

trysts
ChristianSoldier007 wrote:

yeah trysts that feeling of depair... 

every time i face my chess coach

It is surprising how good the titled players are! All the years and games that I've played, and still there are so many more levels that I will never be at, it just amazes me.