1100 CRUSHES 1800 in Complete Domination!!
Sort:
Cherub_Enjel
May 8, 2017
0
#21
In addition, my games were never shut down by chess.com. The timer simply proceeded forth. Notice how the game vs. this 1800 was a long and grueling battle, which started in January. Truly a spectacular, hard-earned victory.
May 8, 2017
0
#22
Got my account back!
4 days ago · #1 Cherub_Enjel
Hey everyone! Looks like I got my account back!
To all the mods and staff, I learned my lesson not to multi-account / sandbag. It was just a joke lol.
May 8, 2017
0
#23
Sandbagging is a fair play infraction. Fair play involves more than using an engine.
May 8, 2017
0
#24
In sum, I ask of you two things: (1) That you familiarize yourself with *facts* (and true ones, at that) before making brash claims, and (2) That you respect the fact that I won a very hard-fought victory. Feel free to be helpful for once, by the way, and give me some playing advice in the serious thread I started about the same game. If you want to be helpful, of course.
May 8, 2017
0
#26
My account was closed for "abuse". Another account was closed for fair play infractions. Which account do you see here?
May 8, 2017
0
#27
Cherub_Enjel wrote:
My account was closed for "abuse". Another account was closed for fair play infractions. Which account do you see here?
The account I see here is the same account that posted an apology (#26). 1st I said not many would step up and take responsibility, and wished you luck. But it's obvious you've not changed. All these threads, mocking your opponents. One accusing a player of cheating over the fact you do not know the rules regarding castling in 960 chess. By your final comment "I was only joking, lol" We should have seen you had no intention of reform. Just not to get caught next time is more like it. 2nd. You asked which account do I see ? Saying it was another account of yours that was banned for fair play. Somehow that excludes the account we see as not violating fair play ? You created multiple accounts, well over 3 and sandbagged rating points. We are adults here. Not fooled by that rigeramol.
The trick, then, is to do it again.
May 9, 2017
0
#29
SpasskyKhan101 escribió:
BronsteinPawn wrote:
Memes work like viruses. Everyone, be a host cell!
Los memes son patrimonio cultural Mexicano 
May 9, 2017
0
#30
So this thread gets 40 replies, and my other one, asking for analysis on this same game, full of mistakes, gets 2.
This was just meant to be a funny thread, and it appears people are drawn to it, especially those who claim to "not like trolling".
May 9, 2017
0
#31
Your sense of humor is the problem. This explains the grief you receive. You think it's funny to mock opponents, by your own words. This attitude pisses off most of us who respect the game and those who we play against. To you, it's all just a joke. There's a few who tag along. Subscribe to similiar bashing. It's very obvious the mentality.
I'm telling you buster, you won't last long, no matter your chess skills, this attitude of yours will end unfavorably for you.
I've said my peace.
May 9, 2017
0
#32
By his own admission above, the OP created this thread as a joke. I'm quite sure as I understand TOS , chess.com if it choose to could sanction his account for this violation.
May 13, 2017
0
#35
Tournament games of Cherub_Engel are once again timing out.
Apology accepted. Didn't take a brain surgeon to see thru his antics.
May 13, 2017
0
#38
intersectinglines escribió:
Why black did not take the free knight on move 18?
Nothing is free in life.
May 13, 2017
0
#39
intersectinglines wrote:
Why black did not take the free knight on move 18?
That's a very good question. BronsteinPawn gave you an excellent answer.
May 13, 2017
0
#40
Cherub_Enjel wrote:
intersectinglines wrote:
Why black did not take the free knight on move 18?
That's a very good question. BronsteinPawn gave you an excellent answer.
Except there is no "free knight" lol.
Well it was "free" but losing the Queen. Cherub_Enjel can whoop anybody giving his Queen for the almighty Knight