Read my posts in this thread. Posts # 4, 7-to-10 and especially post #12. Then play over the three sample games, reading the notes to the moves.
GM Larry Evans' method of static analysis - Chess Forums - Chess.com
I just read your posts blueemu, it feels like rocket science do you really teach chess this way? or i'll change my question, do masters learned chess this way? is this how the system work, all these calculations are necessary?
It's ONE way to learn chess.
There are as many paths as there are people, and some Masters followed this path. Others found their own path.
Larry Evans, a Grandmaster who used to hang out with Bobby Fischer, was a big advocate of this method.
If you want to read a chess book that will blow your mind, try Pawn Power in Chess by Hans Kmoch. It's an extremely polarizing book, you'll either love him or hate him. Some people think he's crazy. Other insist that he's just drunk. I think he's a genius. You'll basically need to learn a new language, or at least a new set of technical terms. Duo. Ram. Lever. Straggler. Twin. Lee. Luff. Front-span. Rear-span. Leucopenia. Melanopenia. And so on. I read the book three times. Not kidding.
Read my posts in this thread. Posts # 4, 7-to-10 and especially post #12. Then play over the three sample games, reading the notes to the moves.
GM Larry Evans' method of static analysis - Chess Forums - Chess.com
I just read your posts blueemu, it feels like rocket science
do you really teach chess this way? or i'll change my question, do masters learned chess this way? is this how the system work, all these calculations are necessary?