2-dimensional vs 3-dimensional
Sort:
Most Recent
Forum Legend
Following
New Comments
Locked Topic
Pinned Topic
Does anyone else find it easier to work out problems with an actual board rather than just an image? I know it's a lot easier for me to do "mate in 2" puzzles or look at a position (Tal-Botvinnik 1960, Game 4, move 8, for example) if it's there on a physical chessboard and not just printed on a page. I can manipulate figures in my head just fine, but it just seems to make more sense if I can see it in 3-D.
Anyone else or am I likely to be the worst blindfolded chess player ever?