2000 players are pretty cool
2000 rated players are....
Sort:
14 days ago
0
#24
ok I def don’t spend all my time on chess
I play cello and violin like 2 hours a day (total, not 4 hours total lol),
and do other stuff too
ya know when (if) you get 2000 i’m gonna revive this forum and show u that you’re (by YOUR OWN definition) stupid
14 days ago
0
#26
Ineffaceable wrote:
Zidanefre wrote:
... too stupid to be criminals. You see, at 2000 rating, it means you have invested quite some time into chess. Yet you are only 2000. If you are 2000, you can either be stupid or smart. If you are stupid, then you have likely spent all your time studying chess (because you are stupid, so you have to study more). If you are smart, but stuck at 2000, then are you really smart? Therefore you must be stupid. And if you are stupid, then we have looped back to the first part of our argument.
If you're not 2000, don't worry. You might still go outside, so you should still have opportunities.
If everyone who was ever 2000 stupid, then what about you?
please don't insult me by calling me a 2000
14 days ago
0
#27
DreamscapeHorizons wrote:
In conformance with the new politically correct times (think of the book 1984 by George Orwell) the word stupid is just so offensive. How about a new politically correct term like COMPRESSIONALLY CHALLENGED?
compressionally challenged is too big of a word. Instead, I propose a newspeak term: doubleplusunsmart
14 days ago
0
#28
Fet wrote:
#10 No offense bro but I'm not gonna change my plan because of some random online stranger, I know what I'm doing. See, you may be a little too weak for doing stuff like that, but I'm being very serious in chess, and I'm going to get a FIDE title.
I know a couple of people who do coaching pretty much full-time, they always agressively promote their coaching at every opportunity. For example at tournaments, they print lots of flyers, always chat up the parents, and also promote themselves online. I wish you best of luck
14 days ago
0
#29
chessblackbelt wrote:
ya know when (if) you get 2000 i’m gonna revive this forum and show u that you’re (by YOUR OWN definition) stupid
oh no someone is threatening to call me stupid (in the future)
911? Um... yes, someone is threatening to call me names online... no, I don't live in the UK... you can't do anything about it? Darn...
14 days ago
0
#30
Pudding wrote:
The usernames are ragebait but I just can't prove it
we just need a chesblackbelt username now to complete the fantastic four
Are Cheating ..! (40% or more..that what independent studies are showing) are using tabbed up opening browser or salting in engine moves...
When yousee statements like "I went from a 1000 to 2000 without learning any opening theroy or endgame technique... " or "I'm 2000+ elo on chess.com and struggling at 1600 otb "
They are cheating...
Its fairly easy to do ....
The sad thing is....Same garbage cheating is being done over on FIDE... it appears ....where there is a percieved respected elo rating system on the internet .... the cheaters come, like flies to squat!
14 days ago
0
#34
pcalugaru wrote:
Are Cheating ..! (40% or more..that what independent studies are showing) are using tabbed up opening browser or salting in engine moves...
When yousee statements like "I went from a 1000 to 2000 without learning any opening theroy or endgame technique... " or "I'm 2000+ elo on chess.com and struggling at 1600 otb "
Your cheating...
you dont need much opening theory or that good of endgame technique
im pretty sure the person who said this as well obviously knows some theory and doesnt go into endgames clueless on how to convert
also 1600 otb can translate to 2000 cc its possible and likely normal
also what would you know about the experience up here youre only 1300 (not in an insulting way)
Zidanefre wrote:
you're*
related: source is that i made the studies up
Sure bud... Not!!!! a simple YouTube search will bring up the studies.... or a search on Redit does the same...
BUT YOU K eep believing....(and playing the grammer police) it keeps "your "dream alive.
14 days ago
0
#36
Zidanefre wrote:
Ineffaceable wrote:
Zidanefre wrote:
... too stupid to be criminals. You see, at 2000 rating, it means you have invested quite some time into chess. Yet you are only 2000. If you are 2000, you can either be stupid or smart. If you are stupid, then you have likely spent all your time studying chess (because you are stupid, so you have to study more). If you are smart, but stuck at 2000, then are you really smart? Therefore you must be stupid. And if you are stupid, then we have looped back to the first part of our argument.
If you're not 2000, don't worry. You might still go outside, so you should still have opportunities.
If everyone who was ever 2000 stupid, then what about you?
please don't insult me by calling me a 2000
You were once a 2000, were you stupid back then?
14 days ago
0
#37
pcalugaru a écrit :
Are Cheating ..! (40% or more..that what independent studies are showing) are using tabbed up opening browser or salting in engine moves...
When yousee statements like "I went from a 1000 to 2000 without learning any opening theroy or endgame technique... " or "I'm 2000+ elo on chess.com and struggling at 1600 otb "
They are cheating...
Its fairly easy to do ....
The sad thing is....Same garbage cheating is being done over on FIDE... it appears ....where there is a percieved respected elo rating system on the internet .... the cheaters come, like flies to squat!
I think I know who downvoted me lol
14 days ago
0
#38
The issue with people like you who think everyone is cheating is that they'll start cheating by themselves even though not a lot of players cheat. So thinking they're the good guys, the go to the dark side and become the bad guys
Java wrote:
pcalugaru wrote:
Are Cheating ..! (40% or more..that what independent studies are showing) are using tabbed up opening browser or salting in engine moves...
also 1600 otb can translate to 2000 cc its possible and likely normal
also what would you know about the experience up here youre only 1300 (not in an insulting way)
CC chess is computer assisted .... so your premise does not relate...
And im 1890 over on Lichess ... I dick around on chess.com ... after getting burt several times, reporting it and nothing ... I don't play here seriously ... and then ...elo ratings on the internet are not real... .... e.g. your comment about me being 1300... shows you think that's an actual value ...its not... b
due to the facts I stated on my original post .
Yh I think if two naive parents hesitate between two coaches and one tells them “I am a chess National Master”, they're going to take the NM even if it's more expensive