4 bishops or four knighits.

Sort:
Avatar of JustOneUSer
If you had to start a game with 4 bishops, no Knights, or 4 Knights, no Bishops, which one would you choose?

BUT more importantly- how would it effect the way we play our beloved game?
Avatar of Kretinovich

4 knights since the game would become more tactical

Avatar of JustOneUSer
True. Four bishops would also be hard to keep track of.
Avatar of JustOneUSer
The game might also become more closed, I guess.
Avatar of Joel_HirschorrnPHD
I'd say 4 knights too, the bishops would probably end up getting trapped and in each other's ways
Avatar of gingerninja2003

well it depends if the position looked like this

or this.

 

Avatar of JustOneUSer
Oh. I'm not sure.
Maybe your opponent gets the one you don't?

Avatar of gingerninja2003

oh ok like this?

 

Avatar of JustOneUSer
Yeah.
Avatar of JustOneUSer
But I think the other (agaisnt normal) makes more sense.
Avatar of gingerninja2003

i'd say bishops have them all developed in the right places you could cover nearly the whole board while knights you have to re-route to the other side of the board.

Avatar of GrandPatzer13
[COMMENT DELETED]
Avatar of JustOneUSer
Exactly.

So I would say Knights.

Try and make it closed.

If you can't, then you have always got your queen or rooks to go to. You would have to use them a lot more.
Avatar of JustOneUSer
But if you play bishops, but your opponent manages to close it, you have no pecies to use.
Avatar of JustOneUSer
At all, really.
Avatar of poodle_noodle

First instinct is knights, because bishops would be clumsy during the first part of the game.

But you should be able to trade off at least 1 set of minors easily. I think I'd go with bishops.

Avatar of JustOneUSer
Interesting choice.
Avatar of JustOneUSer
What about this-

Normal, or

4 rooks, 1 knight, 1 bishop.

At first it seems great- more rooks!

But I think it may be more complicated... I'd go normal.
Avatar of poodle_noodle

If it's 4 bishops vs 4 knights, the knights will actually have problems getting active I think. And any that do can easily be traded to where you'd have a normal 2 B vs 2 N kind of position.

Avatar of poodle_noodle
VicountVonJames wrote:
What about this-

Normal, or

4 rooks, 1 knight, 1 bishop.

At first it seems great- more rooks!

But I think it may be more complicated... I'd go normal.

When there are 8 pawns each rooks aren't worth a lot... but with so many extra rooks you could do 2 exchange "sacrifices" and have a normal position. So I'd take the 4 rooks.