if he has 28 wins and 28 loses why is it 49% and 48%?
because most programmers are from india, and thats hownlohic works down there
Wow, a racist that can't count to hundred and writes in gibberish English.
Education in UK sucks pretty bad I guess.
if he has 28 wins and 28 loses why is it 49% and 48%?
because most programmers are from india, and thats hownlohic works down there
Wow, a racist that can't count to hundred and writes in gibberish English.
Education in UK sucks pretty bad I guess.
there is nothing racist about that: worst programmers come from india, yet, for some reason, they are used the most (cause company leaders think with their dicks, short-term pleasure is what's important). i got nothing against any other concept of india and indians. as far as that gibberish, that was fat-fingered, actually - nothing to do with education. as far as counting, what was pointed out is that, essentially, the chart was stating that 28!=28, which isnt true (did you know that).
You have provided no evidence :
1. That that stats chart was programmed by some Indian.
2. Worst programmers come from India.
So you're 100% a racist bigot.
there is nothing racist about that: worst programmers come from india, yet, for some reason, they are used the most (cause company leaders think with their dicks, short-term pleasure is what's important). i got nothing against any other concept of india and indians. as far as that gibberish, that was fat-fingered, actually - nothing to do with education. as far as counting, what was pointed out is that, essentially, the chart was stating that 28!=28, which isnt true (did you know that).
You have provided no evidence :
1. That that stats chart was programmed by some Indian.
2. Worst programmers come from India.
So you're 100% a racist bigot.
there is nothing racist about that: worst programmers come from india, yet, for some reason, they are used the most (cause company leaders think with their dicks, short-term pleasure is what's important). i got nothing against any other concept of india and indians. as far as that gibberish, that was fat-fingered, actually - nothing to do with education. as far as counting, what was pointed out is that, essentially, the chart was stating that 28!=28, which isnt true (did you know that).
reported
there is nothing racist about that: worst programmers come from india, yet, for some reason, they are used the most (cause company leaders think with their dicks, short-term pleasure is what's important). i got nothing against any other concept of india and indians. as far as that gibberish, that was fat-fingered, actually - nothing to do with education. as far as counting, what was pointed out is that, essentially, the chart was stating that 28!=28, which isnt true (did you know that).
You have provided no evidence :
1. That that stats chart was programmed by some Indian.
2. Worst programmers come from India.
So you're 100% a racist bigot.
except that's also a falacy
Fallacy not falacy.
Go back to school instead of whining that "Indians took all my jobs" and you might get one.
if he has 28 wins and 28 loses why is it 49% and 48%?
because most programmers are from india, and thats hownlohic works down there
Wow, a racist that can't count to hundred and writes in gibberish English.
Education in UK sucks pretty bad I guess.