Not cool
500 rating in rapid.
Sort:
0
#4
He likely says that it is not cool because most people here can get to 800 almost immediately with little or no practice.
Years of playing has still not gotten you to that easily achievable beginner rating.
I don’t intend this as an insult, it’s just a fact that you are far below the skill level of the average beginner even after playing for three years.
I recommend that you do (many) more tactics, stick to slower time controls, and watch your rating skyrocket.
Years of playing has still not gotten you to that easily achievable beginner rating.
I don’t intend this as an insult, it’s just a fact that you are far below the skill level of the average beginner even after playing for three years.
I recommend that you do (many) more tactics, stick to slower time controls, and watch your rating skyrocket.
0
#5
vineet199 wrote:
I am playing for 3 years and now my rating goes up to 500. Before that I was on 300-400 in rapid.
Cool
so you finally got unmuted I see
if you really want to improve, then do some puzzles, make sure you don't blunder any pieces, and watch some videos to help you improve
0
#6
BroiledRat wrote:
He likely says that it is not cool because most people here can get to 800 almost immediately with little or no practice.
Years of playing has still not gotten you to that easily achievable beginner rating.
I don’t intend this as an insult, it’s just a fact that you are far below the skill level of the average beginner even after playing for three years.
I recommend that you do (many) more tactics, stick to slower time controls, and watch your rating skyrocket.
Years of playing has still not gotten you to that easily achievable beginner rating.
I don’t intend this as an insult, it’s just a fact that you are far below the skill level of the average beginner even after playing for three years.
I recommend that you do (many) more tactics, stick to slower time controls, and watch your rating skyrocket.
But 500 is an achievement for me. Because I was on 300-400 for years. I have done these tactics and slower games but that didn't work.
I don't think you saw many players of this range (300-500) who are at this level for years. So your point of view of chess player is very narrow . And don't it as an insult.
Well thanks for suggestions.
BroiledRat skrev:
He likely says that it is not cool because most people here can get to 800 almost immediately with little or no practice.
Years of playing has still not gotten you to that easily achievable beginner rating.
I don’t intend this as an insult, it’s just a fact that you are far below the skill level of the average beginner even after playing for three years.
I recommend that you do (many) more tactics, stick to slower time controls, and watch your rating skyrocket.
Years of playing has still not gotten you to that easily achievable beginner rating.
I don’t intend this as an insult, it’s just a fact that you are far below the skill level of the average beginner even after playing for three years.
I recommend that you do (many) more tactics, stick to slower time controls, and watch your rating skyrocket.
Also worth noting is that because a person have an account for years doesn't necessarily means he have been hard training for years. You can have an account for 3 years and put in the same time as someone spend on chess in a week,
IDK cool or not. Now 👍👍👍 nvr stop
0
#9
assassin3752 wrote:
vineet199 wrote:
I am playing for 3 years and now my rating goes up to 500. Before that I was on 300-400 in rapid.
Cool
so you finally got unmuted I see
if you really want to improve, then do some puzzles, make sure you don't blunder any pieces, and watch some videos to help you improve
Did I ask you help??
No?
So ...
0
#10
Jimemy wrote:
BroiledRat skrev:
He likely says that it is not cool because most people here can get to 800 almost immediately with little or no practice.
Years of playing has still not gotten you to that easily achievable beginner rating.
I don’t intend this as an insult, it’s just a fact that you are far below the skill level of the average beginner even after playing for three years.
I recommend that you do (many) more tactics, stick to slower time controls, and watch your rating skyrocket.
Years of playing has still not gotten you to that easily achievable beginner rating.
I don’t intend this as an insult, it’s just a fact that you are far below the skill level of the average beginner even after playing for three years.
I recommend that you do (many) more tactics, stick to slower time controls, and watch your rating skyrocket.
Also worth noting is that because a person have an account for years doesn't necessarily means he have been hard training for years. You can have an account for 3 years and put in the same time as someone spend on chess in a week,
Yes. It's for fun for me.
You have been playing for 3 YEARS and you have tried a grand total of 5 puzzles. Probably that is the explanation why your rating is only 500, which is beginner level. You should be doing 5 puzzles per day, not 5 in 3 years.
0
#12
magipi wrote:
You have been playing for 3 YEARS and you have tried a grand total of 5 puzzles. Probably that is the explanation why your rating is only 500, which is beginner level. You should be doing 5 puzzles per day, not 5 in 3 years.
I did 1000 puzzles on chessking app, chess tempo etc. Tactics and all I have done.
Jimemy wrote:
BroiledRat skrev:
He likely says that it is not cool because most people here can get to 800 almost immediately with little or no practice.
Years of playing has still not gotten you to that easily achievable beginner rating.
I don’t intend this as an insult, it’s just a fact that you are far below the skill level of the average beginner even after playing for three years.
I recommend that you do (many) more tactics, stick to slower time controls, and watch your rating skyrocket.
Years of playing has still not gotten you to that easily achievable beginner rating.
I don’t intend this as an insult, it’s just a fact that you are far below the skill level of the average beginner even after playing for three years.
I recommend that you do (many) more tactics, stick to slower time controls, and watch your rating skyrocket.
Also worth noting is that because a person have an account for years doesn't necessarily means he have been hard training for years. You can have an account for 3 years and put in the same time as someone spend on chess in a week,
I played casually and got up to 1600. Now I'm actually studying.
#3 okay, its not cool for me. Btw what do you consider cool?
#9 you did ask for our help so chill out and please don’t start insulting people again
But don’t worry about your rating, and it’s ok if your not as naturally gifted at chess like other people are, if you commit and study and do tactics and really take time to understand how the tactic works as well as looking at the entire board and considering each pieces threats to not blunder I’m sure you will get a higher rating
AunTheKnight skrev:
Jimemy wrote:
BroiledRat skrev:
He likely says that it is not cool because most people here can get to 800 almost immediately with little or no practice.
Years of playing has still not gotten you to that easily achievable beginner rating.
I don’t intend this as an insult, it’s just a fact that you are far below the skill level of the average beginner even after playing for three years.
I recommend that you do (many) more tactics, stick to slower time controls, and watch your rating skyrocket.
Years of playing has still not gotten you to that easily achievable beginner rating.
I don’t intend this as an insult, it’s just a fact that you are far below the skill level of the average beginner even after playing for three years.
I recommend that you do (many) more tactics, stick to slower time controls, and watch your rating skyrocket.
Also worth noting is that because a person have an account for years doesn't necessarily means he have been hard training for years. You can have an account for 3 years and put in the same time as someone spend on chess in a week,
I played casually and got up to 1600. Now I'm actually studying.
Have you played at a chessclub?
Jimemy wrote:
AunTheKnight skrev:
Jimemy wrote:
BroiledRat skrev:
He likely says that it is not cool because most people here can get to 800 almost immediately with little or no practice.
Years of playing has still not gotten you to that easily achievable beginner rating.
I don’t intend this as an insult, it’s just a fact that you are far below the skill level of the average beginner even after playing for three years.
I recommend that you do (many) more tactics, stick to slower time controls, and watch your rating skyrocket.
Years of playing has still not gotten you to that easily achievable beginner rating.
I don’t intend this as an insult, it’s just a fact that you are far below the skill level of the average beginner even after playing for three years.
I recommend that you do (many) more tactics, stick to slower time controls, and watch your rating skyrocket.
Also worth noting is that because a person have an account for years doesn't necessarily means he have been hard training for years. You can have an account for 3 years and put in the same time as someone spend on chess in a week,
I played casually and got up to 1600. Now I'm actually studying.
Have you played at a chessclub?
I do now.
AunTheKnight skrev:
Jimemy wrote:
AunTheKnight skrev:
Jimemy wrote:
BroiledRat skrev:
He likely says that it is not cool because most people here can get to 800 almost immediately with little or no practice.
Years of playing has still not gotten you to that easily achievable beginner rating.
I don’t intend this as an insult, it’s just a fact that you are far below the skill level of the average beginner even after playing for three years.
I recommend that you do (many) more tactics, stick to slower time controls, and watch your rating skyrocket.
Years of playing has still not gotten you to that easily achievable beginner rating.
I don’t intend this as an insult, it’s just a fact that you are far below the skill level of the average beginner even after playing for three years.
I recommend that you do (many) more tactics, stick to slower time controls, and watch your rating skyrocket.
Also worth noting is that because a person have an account for years doesn't necessarily means he have been hard training for years. You can have an account for 3 years and put in the same time as someone spend on chess in a week,
I played casually and got up to 1600. Now I'm actually studying.
Have you played at a chessclub?
I do now.
What was your rating on this website before you started at a chessclub?
Jimemy wrote:
AunTheKnight skrev:
Jimemy wrote:
AunTheKnight skrev:
Jimemy wrote:
BroiledRat skrev:
He likely says that it is not cool because most people here can get to 800 almost immediately with little or no practice.
Years of playing has still not gotten you to that easily achievable beginner rating.
I don’t intend this as an insult, it’s just a fact that you are far below the skill level of the average beginner even after playing for three years.
I recommend that you do (many) more tactics, stick to slower time controls, and watch your rating skyrocket.
Years of playing has still not gotten you to that easily achievable beginner rating.
I don’t intend this as an insult, it’s just a fact that you are far below the skill level of the average beginner even after playing for three years.
I recommend that you do (many) more tactics, stick to slower time controls, and watch your rating skyrocket.
Also worth noting is that because a person have an account for years doesn't necessarily means he have been hard training for years. You can have an account for 3 years and put in the same time as someone spend on chess in a week,
I played casually and got up to 1600. Now I'm actually studying.
Have you played at a chessclub?
I do now.
What was your rating on this website before you started at a chessclub?
1600. I did say I started playing seriously after I hit 1600
Please Sign Up to comment.
If you need help, please contact our Help and Support team.
I am playing for 3 years and now my rating goes up to 500. Before that I was on 300-400 in rapid.
Cool