960-Rating and USCF

Sort:
Ruy1Lopez

Hi everybody,

I noticed many people that the 960-rating closer to the real scorenumbers than the standard rating. In the standard rating, there are differences of 200-300 points. In the 960-Chess is it much the same.

DrawMaster

If you have substantive data, why not write a blog showing the data and your conclusion(s). This would an interesting study. But data are needed to make any strong point.

Ruy1Lopez
DrawMaster wrote:

If you have substantive data, why not write a blog showing the data and your conclusion(s). This would an interesting study. But data are needed to make any strong point.


Unfortunately I have no data. The expense would be too large to consider this.Rather, I would only want to know whether other users have also made ​​this observation. Furthermore, I think the rating classification from 1200 is a little unhappy if already a standard classification. You play against people who have a standard rating of 2000 and they are rated at 960 with 1200. That does not fit.

DrawMaster

Ruy, here's an example of what can be done to get data here at chess.com ...

Ratings Comparison