This is a good game, in the sense that you can learn from it. Look at the position on move 17: you have little to no space to develop and attack, whereas most of black pieces are in action, ready to launch an attack. I think f4 was not a good idea, as his e pawn becomes very powerful.
So yeah instead of keeping the position locked on ranks 456, it would probably have been better to trade pawns.
I was a little suspicious about the game in the first place but your opponent's account looks pretty clean, so not gonna make a public accusation and lock this thread lol
I just hit 2000 blitz with a new opening, the Nimzowitsch Larsen Attack! Might make a guide on it at this rate!
And you clowned on it when I played it…. Tsk tsk tsk…. “Wannabe alekhine……” is what you said tsk tsk tsk, was the opening that won me eleven games in a row and you clowned on it but now who’s laughing….
*Ahem*
I just hit 2000 blitz with a new opening, the Nimzowitsch Larsen Attack! Might make a guide on it at this rate!
And you clowned on it when I played it…. Tsk tsk tsk…. “Wannabe alekhine……” is what you said tsk tsk tsk, was the opening that won me eleven games in a row and you clowned on it but now who’s laughing….
*Ahem*
Hey I corrected myself once I saw the Larsen part
(According to Google translate this means I hate it when it times out when I’m about to win)
Yeah I think most people do, it’s only happened to me once or two times but it’s the most annoying chess thing I’ve had.
I would have loads of brilliancies, except chess.com is unreasonably prejudiced against my crap chess.
"Crap", you say? Let's see...
Oh I can't challenge you
I have adjusted my settings, you should be able to challenge me if you want.
In people's opinions, what is a reasonable amount of daily games to play at the same time?
Rate the game /10