I think that conventional, orthodox human chess cannot beat stockfish. You would have to approach chess differently than just the extrapolation of patterns and conventional wisdom and that requires a far greater eminence than (the already difficult) game normally does already.
That said, I do believe people can surpass engines, even with how quickly they are improving. I just don't think everyone can do it, just some of the brightest and most specialized / inclined.
Those thoughts are very interesting. But I desagree, because engines were programmed by humans, so they think like humans, they can't do anything different or superior.
That's a non-sequitur and contradicts previous statements of yours.


So this lying sack of crap would not be 1300 if he could think 25 moves deep.
He puts the onus on others to prove he is wrong, as he refuses to prove he is telling the truth. That's been the MO of skumbags and con men for hundreds of years.
This is a waste of time. When that journalist verifys that this guy is the greatest player ever I'm sure I will hear about it. Until then I'm out.