Abolish stalemate. Vote yes or no. Give no reason, just vote.
Sort:
COOKIE'S COOKIE'S COOKIE'S.
No
No
No
No never nope.
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
26 no. 3 yes. I missed post 114.
Conflagration_Planet wrote:
26 yes. 2 no.
Either
a) You have demonstrated we all suck at multiple choice
b) Your brains are scrambled by all the fine quality posts
c) You are a fibber (I know, it seems scarcely credible)
d) Your account has been hacked by the Anonymous Monster
Personally, I favour reason d).
Yes
Here_Is_Plenty wrote:
Conflagration_Planet wrote:
26 yes. 2 no.
Either
a) You have demonstrated we all suck at multiple choice
b) Your brains are scrambled by all the fine quality posts
c) You are a fibber (I know, it seems scarcely credible)
d) Your account has been hacked by the Anonymous Monster
Personally, I favour reason d).
I'm losing my mind. I meant 26 no. 2 yes!!!!!!
NO!
Stalement is sometimes the only realistic option available to us, I'm sure many chess enthusiasts would agree that they would prefer a win at any expense and if it were not possible, we'd rather take a draw than a loss.
Okay. 27 no. 2 yes.
I over looked post #114. It's now 27 no. 3 yes.
I keep singing that song.
How about flipping a coin when stalemate occurs: heads - white wins -- tails black wins -- no draws
Flipping a coin is reserved for important stuff, like the Super Bowl. >:[