Accidentally played rated chess games
Sort:
ChristofferN
Sep 29, 2016
0
#41
Change your calculator. Quickly.
Sep 29, 2016
0
#42
Use an engine to get back to your original rating. That will suit you....coz u don't seem to have that determination, that spark to improve.
Sep 29, 2016
0
#43
A real Leet guy could hack the site and change the rating back to 1337. Just sayin'...
El_Goffman, I haven't even climbed my own stairway to truth and I'm also winded. Maybe I should do more cardio.
Prite, I don't have the determination to play worse nor to use an engine to play worse. I'm just that lazy. Back to that concept of doing cardio... Too lazy. Running back and forth between these concepts is exercise enough.
Escher is right, though. I'm not a leet hacker. I'm not even a standard hacker. What do???
I almost made it back to 1337. Had I lost my last game, I would've been... Back home. I even played sleepy to ensure a loss. But now, it is but the dream of a butt.
Sep 29, 2016
0
#46
Tom_Brady_SB49_Champ wrote:
StairwayToTruth wrote:
Hi everyone,
I accidentally just played about 5 rated blitz games. I didn't realize they were rated until... It was too late. Is there a way for chess.com to return my rating to what it previously was (1337)? I had kept it at that value for many years, as it was my intention to keep it at that value permanently and to always play unrated games.
Silly V3 tricked me into thinking these were unrated games!
This alone is the reason I'm posting in pdela's new chess.com thread (even though I posted there before this happened).
Who cares? It's just a stupid online number that means absolutely nothing.
Yeah, it means absolutely nothing, just like how Tom Brady and the Cheatriots mean nothing on this planet. Football wannabes that can't win a football game without cheating, and yet there's still one team they can't beat WITH cheating!
Your rating is about as important as the Cheatriots are!
ThrillerFan, I'm not such a huge fan of sports. That's why I play chess (barely but I think it still counts).
Sep 29, 2016
0
#48
ThrillerFan wrote:
Tom_Brady_SB49_Champ wrote:
StairwayToTruth wrote:
Hi everyone,
I accidentally just played about 5 rated blitz games. I didn't realize they were rated until... It was too late. Is there a way for chess.com to return my rating to what it previously was (1337)? I had kept it at that value for many years, as it was my intention to keep it at that value permanently and to always play unrated games.
Silly V3 tricked me into thinking these were unrated games!
This alone is the reason I'm posting in pdela's new chess.com thread (even though I posted there before this happened).
Who cares? It's just a stupid online number that means absolutely nothing.
Yeah, it means absolutely nothing, just like how Tom Brady and the Cheatriots mean nothing on this planet. Football wannabes that can't win a football game without cheating, and yet there's still one team they can't beat WITH cheating!
Your rating is about as important as the Cheatriots are!
I love how you continue crying of how the Patriots cheat even though this thread had absolutely nothing to do with football.
ThrillerFan wrote:
Tom_Brady_SB49_Champ wrote:
StairwayToTruth wrote:
Hi everyone,
I accidentally just played about 5 rated blitz games. I didn't realize they were rated until... It was too late. Is there a way for chess.com to return my rating to what it previously was (1337)? I had kept it at that value for many years, as it was my intention to keep it at that value permanently and to always play unrated games.
Silly V3 tricked me into thinking these were unrated games!
This alone is the reason I'm posting in pdela's new chess.com thread (even though I posted there before this happened).
Who cares? It's just a stupid online number that means absolutely nothing.
Yeah, it means absolutely nothing, just like how Tom Brady and the Cheatriots mean nothing on this planet. Football wannabes that can't win a football game without cheating, and yet there's still one team they can't beat WITH cheating!
Your rating is about as important as the Cheatriots are!
False accusations of cheating are not allowed on chess.com.
As the creator of this thread, I think it is, indeed, a football thread. Haven't you been reading/paying attention?
Sep 29, 2016
0
#51
StairwayToTruth wrote:
As the creator of this thread, I think it is, indeed, a football thread. Haven't you been reading/paying attention?
The thread is becoming deflated...
When you need reminding that life is already too short ...
Karpark wrote:
When you need reminding that life is already too short ...
... you waste the precious few moments of your life creating comments and threads about it on chess.com?
I'd be more sympathetic if you had picked a prime number instead.
Sep 30, 2016
0
#56
I'd be even more sympathetic if the next multiple of 7 was used, making it divisible by 6, hence 42.
We have already discussed this. 1337 IS, in fact, divisible by 42. I shall hear no more questions about this! The math discussion here is closed! Back to football!
Sep 30, 2016
0
#58
yeah, I don't get it, been playing chess on-line a long time too; just play and don't pay attention to the ratings, it's just no fun if you are too anal about ratings