I have stuck with top g all the way and stood up for im against my brainwashed friends
Andrew Tate's chess account
Sort:
whisper2016 wrote:
KingPawnTommy wrote:
I have stuck with top g all the way and stood up for im against my brainwashed friends
God wills, brother
Im a agent of the matrix, Im coming for you, we must return you to the matrix
whisper2016 wrote:
lmao bro got released
Top G 😎💪🔥
source? you made it up again.
Aug 9, 2023
0
#265
He's not had his charges dropped. There's a big difference. Just like when he was moved out of prison into house arrest, his charges still stand.
Top G
I don't see the relation between (accusion) for trafficking and banning the man's chess account.
If he is guily the judge will decide how he will get punished. Probably with time in jail. That is the punishment...... If the judge decides to also ban his chess.com account that can also be the punishment.
But ban a user for the things he did in real life? And also ban him for buying a car, going to the supermarket, having a holiday, reading a book etcetera etcetera??? I don't think we should get into that direction....
@Dylianisbadatchess how old are you genuine question
Aug 9, 2023
0
#269
KingPawnTommy wrote:
@Dylianisbadatchess how old are you genuine question
he is 2
jimmypost wrote:
I don't see the relation between (accusion) for trafficking and banning the man's chess account.
If he is guily the judge will decide how he will get punished. Probably with time in jail. That is the punishment...... If the judge decides to also ban his chess.com account that can also be the punishment.
But ban a user for the things he did in real life? And also ban him for buying a car, going to the supermarket, having a holiday, reading a book etcetera etcetera??? I don't think we should get into that direction....
It might have had something to do with his username. Refer to chess.com's past stance on this. https://www.chess.com/article/view/on-the-invasion-of-ukraine. I have been away for a while, so I don't know if things have changed at chess.com.
Or it might have something to do with the only game played on that account. 98.2% accuracy. Alright, that can happen, nothing strange in that. Pretty much all his moves are top engine lines, and a couple are the next best lines. Then look at his time usage. In a 10-minute game, most of his moves are 2-3 seconds, and a single one is 5 seconds. Idk, he might just be used to blitz. But taking into consideration the accuracy, the engine lines, and the very consistent time management, it is quite likely that the account was closed for, you know, the reason mentioned, fair play. If it had been for another reason, like the Russia thing, or his irl charges, it would probably be under community guidelines.
Stop talkin if you don't know what's going on.. useless comments
Arjun_Borade wrote:
jimmypost wrote:
I don't see the relation between (accusion) for trafficking and banning the man's chess account.
If he is guily the judge will decide how he will get punished. Probably with time in jail. That is the punishment...... If the judge decides to also ban his chess.com account that can also be the punishment.
But ban a user for the things he did in real life? And also ban him for buying a car, going to the supermarket, having a holiday, reading a book etcetera etcetera??? I don't think we should get into that direction....
It might have had something to do with his username. Refer to chess.com's past stance on this. https://www.chess.com/article/view/on-the-invasion-of-ukraine. I have been away for a while, so I don't know if things have changed at chess.com.
Or it might have something to do with the only game played on that account. 98.2% accuracy. Alright, that can happen, nothing strange in that. Pretty much all his moves are top engine lines, and a couple are the next best lines. Then look at his time usage. In a 10-minute game, most of his moves are 2-3 seconds, and a single one is 5 seconds. Idk, he might just be used to blitz. But taking into consideration the accuracy, the engine lines, and the very consistent time management, it is quite likely that the account was closed for, you know, the reason mentioned, fair play. If it had been for another reason, like the Russia thing, or his irl charges, it would probably be under community guidelines.
The account Putinwillwin was previously owned by Tate, his username was changed either by himself or by Chess.com themselves, likely for the reasons mentioned regarding Ukraine. The subsequent owner of the Putinwillwin username has no association with the original account, owned by Tate, as the user ID is completely different.
Aug 23, 2023
0
#276
Deletedusername_FBWHL wrote:
BombCraft wrote:
TheSampson wrote:
People like Tate who are willing to inspire the new generation to be better than the last is what we need in this world. People like Tate who are insecure misogynists, brag about their possessions, and claim they’re better than everyone else is not what we need in this world.
True. But i can make sure gen alpha is better than... my trainwreck of a generation better by teaching people to treat everyone equally.
Christians = Muslims = Jews = Hindus = Atheists = Buddhists = any other religion
(note: the people are fine, i hate the beliefs because they teach things contrary to treating everyone equally)
Men = Women = the 347936546403825642308765872367586304 different minority genders
Straight = LGBTQ
White = Black = Asian = Hispanic = Latino = did i miss any other races?
etc.
cring
Did you just say that equality is cringe?
Aug 23, 2023
0
#278
Guys stop wasting time go do 50 push ups and thn breath 30kg of air and drink one litre sparkling water.
and, who ate?
No