lmao bro got released
Top G 😎💪🔥
Andrew Tate's chess account
Sort:
I have stuck with top g all the way and stood up for im against my brainwashed friends
Aug 5, 2023
0
#264
KingPawnTommy wrote:
I have stuck with top g all the way and stood up for im against my brainwashed friends
God wills, brother
whisper2016 wrote:
KingPawnTommy wrote:
I have stuck with top g all the way and stood up for im against my brainwashed friends
God wills, brother
Im a agent of the matrix, Im coming for you, we must return you to the matrix
whisper2016 wrote:
lmao bro got released
Top G 😎💪🔥
source? you made it up again.
Aug 8, 2023
0
#267
DylianIsBadAtChess wrote:
whisper2016 wrote:
lmao bro got released
Top G 😎💪🔥
source? you made it up again.
hardly. You can see that he was released from house arrest, just check cnn or the guardian
Aug 8, 2023
0
#268
actual_knight_gaming wrote:
Soniasthetics wrote:
Wolfbird wrote:
DylianIsBadAtChess wrote:
industrialrevolution54 wrote:
did he get stat wiped?
he has been banned because he is in detention for Sexually assaulting his workers.
His workers?! He's in detention for holding women against their will and forcing them to perform sexual acts on camera.
Kinda mad to just confirm accusations with no proof.
Btw this post aged like milk.
Actually, aged like fine wine.
cough still arrested cough cough
blud, it aged like milk
Aug 9, 2023
0
#269
He's not had his charges dropped. There's a big difference. Just like when he was moved out of prison into house arrest, his charges still stand.
Top G
I don't see the relation between (accusion) for trafficking and banning the man's chess account.
If he is guily the judge will decide how he will get punished. Probably with time in jail. That is the punishment...... If the judge decides to also ban his chess.com account that can also be the punishment.
But ban a user for the things he did in real life? And also ban him for buying a car, going to the supermarket, having a holiday, reading a book etcetera etcetera??? I don't think we should get into that direction....
Aug 9, 2023
0
#272
xor_eax_eax05 wrote:
He's not had his charges dropped. There's a big difference. Just like when he was moved out of prison into house arrest, his charges still stand.
obviously. I never mentioned charges dropping, only a release from house arrest
@Dylianisbadatchess how old are you genuine question
Aug 9, 2023
0
#274
KingPawnTommy wrote:
@Dylianisbadatchess how old are you genuine question
he is 2
jimmypost wrote:
I don't see the relation between (accusion) for trafficking and banning the man's chess account.
If he is guily the judge will decide how he will get punished. Probably with time in jail. That is the punishment...... If the judge decides to also ban his chess.com account that can also be the punishment.
But ban a user for the things he did in real life? And also ban him for buying a car, going to the supermarket, having a holiday, reading a book etcetera etcetera??? I don't think we should get into that direction....
It might have had something to do with his username. Refer to chess.com's past stance on this. https://www.chess.com/article/view/on-the-invasion-of-ukraine. I have been away for a while, so I don't know if things have changed at chess.com.
Or it might have something to do with the only game played on that account. 98.2% accuracy. Alright, that can happen, nothing strange in that. Pretty much all his moves are top engine lines, and a couple are the next best lines. Then look at his time usage. In a 10-minute game, most of his moves are 2-3 seconds, and a single one is 5 seconds. Idk, he might just be used to blitz. But taking into consideration the accuracy, the engine lines, and the very consistent time management, it is quite likely that the account was closed for, you know, the reason mentioned, fair play. If it had been for another reason, like the Russia thing, or his irl charges, it would probably be under community guidelines.
Stop talkin if you don't know what's going on.. useless comments
Arjun_Borade wrote:
jimmypost wrote:
I don't see the relation between (accusion) for trafficking and banning the man's chess account.
If he is guily the judge will decide how he will get punished. Probably with time in jail. That is the punishment...... If the judge decides to also ban his chess.com account that can also be the punishment.
But ban a user for the things he did in real life? And also ban him for buying a car, going to the supermarket, having a holiday, reading a book etcetera etcetera??? I don't think we should get into that direction....
It might have had something to do with his username. Refer to chess.com's past stance on this. https://www.chess.com/article/view/on-the-invasion-of-ukraine. I have been away for a while, so I don't know if things have changed at chess.com.
Or it might have something to do with the only game played on that account. 98.2% accuracy. Alright, that can happen, nothing strange in that. Pretty much all his moves are top engine lines, and a couple are the next best lines. Then look at his time usage. In a 10-minute game, most of his moves are 2-3 seconds, and a single one is 5 seconds. Idk, he might just be used to blitz. But taking into consideration the accuracy, the engine lines, and the very consistent time management, it is quite likely that the account was closed for, you know, the reason mentioned, fair play. If it had been for another reason, like the Russia thing, or his irl charges, it would probably be under community guidelines.
The account Putinwillwin was previously owned by Tate, his username was changed either by himself or by Chess.com themselves, likely for the reasons mentioned regarding Ukraine. The subsequent owner of the Putinwillwin username has no association with the original account, owned by Tate, as the user ID is completely different.
No