Andrew Tate's chess account

Sort:
OrphanGenerator
AlexChillOut wrote:

perhaps it would be a good idea to wait for tate's trial before attempting to say that he is 100% innocent or 100% guilty
also why is there a fight about this on the chess.com forums out of all places

humans hate to love and love to hate

Daniil_Yakovlev
SoupSailor72 wrote:
“OrphanGenerator wrote:
Daniil_Tate wrote:
SoupSailor72 wrote:
“on his website he said he has a webcam business where he made women perform sexual acts. i think that qualifies as proven guilty”
That’s not illegal.
or true
there is documentation of this, try... idk, any video on him or the war room
like? bruh i watch tatespeech and i never saw anything remotely resembling proof”
Lol you are listening without your brain, it’s one of his favorite things to talk about

then where on tate speech?

Daniil_Yakovlev
OrphanGenerator wrote:
Daniil_Tate wrote:
OrphanGenerator wrote:
Daniil_Tate wrote:
SoupSailor72 wrote:
“on his website he said he has a webcam business where he made women perform sexual acts. i think that qualifies as proven guilty”
That’s not illegal.

or true

there is documentation of this, try... idk, any video on him or the war room

like? bruh i watch tatespeech and i never saw anything remotely resembling proof

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vlT3zUrRT6c

notice how that isnt tatespeech

OrphanGenerator
Daniil_Tate wrote:
OrphanGenerator wrote:
Daniil_Tate wrote:
OrphanGenerator wrote:
Daniil_Tate wrote:
SoupSailor72 wrote:
“on his website he said he has a webcam business where he made women perform sexual acts. i think that qualifies as proven guilty”
That’s not illegal.

or true

there is documentation of this, try... idk, any video on him or the war room

like? bruh i watch tatespeech and i never saw anything remotely resembling proof

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vlT3zUrRT6c

notice how that isnt tatespeech

notice how this doesnt matter since the video directly cites tates website as a source

Daniil_Yakovlev

notice how it still isnt his site

OrphanGenerator
Daniil_Tate wrote:

notice how it still isnt his site

im not sure what ur talking about but this is the official site of the war room which is led by mr tate

Daniil_Yakovlev
OrphanGenerator wrote:
Daniil_Tate wrote:

notice how it still isnt his site

im not sure what ur talking about but this is the official site of the war room which is led by mr tate

funny because i have the war room and the 41 tenets on another tab open and it doesnt say anything like that

OrphanGenerator
Daniil_Tate wrote:
OrphanGenerator wrote:
Daniil_Tate wrote:

notice how it still isnt his site

im not sure what ur talking about but this is the official site of the war room which is led by mr tate

funny because i have the war room and the 41 tenets on another tab open and it doesnt say anything like that

did you even watch the video

Daniil_Yakovlev
Daniil_Tate wrote:
OrphanGenerator wrote:
Daniil_Tate wrote:
OrphanGenerator wrote:
Daniil_Tate wrote:

notice how it still isnt his site

im not sure what ur talking about but this is the official site of the war room which is led by mr tate

funny because i have the war room and the 41 tenets on another tab open and it doesnt say anything like that

did you even watch the video

thats the defense? i read directly from the source. i watched tate speech and confidential. i read the 41 tenets. everything i need to know, i already know. i dont need to watch the video

OrphanGenerator
Daniil_Tate wrote:
OrphanGenerator wrote:
Daniil_Tate wrote:
OrphanGenerator wrote:
Daniil_Tate wrote:

notice how it still isnt his site

im not sure what ur talking about but this is the official site of the war room which is led by mr tate

funny because i have the war room and the 41 tenets on another tab open and it doesnt say anything like that

did you even watch the video

thats the defense? i read directly from the source. i dont need to watch the video

just looked at the website, it looks like it was updated since the video was uploaded to get rid of the female manipulation part (and to make the site look nicer, which worked imo)

Daniil_Yakovlev
OrphanGenerator wrote:
Daniil_Tate wrote:
OrphanGenerator wrote:
Daniil_Tate wrote:
OrphanGenerator wrote:
Daniil_Tate wrote:

notice how it still isnt his site

im not sure what ur talking about but this is the official site of the war room which is led by mr tate

funny because i have the war room and the 41 tenets on another tab open and it doesnt say anything like that

did you even watch the video

thats the defense? i read directly from the source. i dont need to watch the video

just looked at the website, it looks like it was updated since the video was uploaded to get rid of the female manipulation part (and to make the site look nicer, which worked imo)

maybe why the site doesnt have it now is because it never had it. ive had the site open alongside my email and youtube for weeks. it never had any of that. thats the problem with your middlemen. they twist the truth for their convenience. middlemen do this all the time. thats how chernobyl happened. if you want truth about something, dont use them.

OrphanGenerator
Daniil_Tate wrote:
OrphanGenerator wrote:
Daniil_Tate wrote:
OrphanGenerator wrote:
Daniil_Tate wrote:
OrphanGenerator wrote:
Daniil_Tate wrote:

notice how it still isnt his site

im not sure what ur talking about but this is the official site of the war room which is led by mr tate

funny because i have the war room and the 41 tenets on another tab open and it doesnt say anything like that

did you even watch the video

thats the defense? i read directly from the source. i dont need to watch the video

just looked at the website, it looks like it was updated since the video was uploaded to get rid of the female manipulation part (and to make the site look nicer, which worked imo)

maybe why the site doesnt have it now is because it never had it. ive had the site open alongside my email and youtube for weeks. it never had any of that. thats the problem with your middlemen. they twist the truth for their convenience. middlemen do this all the time. thats how chernobyl happened. if you want truth about something, dont use them.

again, did you watch the video? example of a website updating to prove it happened: twitter recently added 2 more badges, gray/grey badges for politicians and gold badges for businesses. politicians get them free, businesses have to pay a whole lotta money (unless if they're one of the most successful businesses ever)

Daniil_Yakovlev
OrphanGenerator wrote:
Daniil_Tate wrote:
OrphanGenerator wrote:
Daniil_Tate wrote:
OrphanGenerator wrote:
Daniil_Tate wrote:
OrphanGenerator wrote:
Daniil_Tate wrote:

notice how it still isnt his site

im not sure what ur talking about but this is the official site of the war room which is led by mr tate

funny because i have the war room and the 41 tenets on another tab open and it doesnt say anything like that

did you even watch the video

thats the defense? i read directly from the source. i dont need to watch the video

just looked at the website, it looks like it was updated since the video was uploaded to get rid of the female manipulation part (and to make the site look nicer, which worked imo)

maybe why the site doesnt have it now is because it never had it. ive had the site open alongside my email and youtube for weeks. it never had any of that. thats the problem with your middlemen. they twist the truth for their convenience. middlemen do this all the time. thats how chernobyl happened. if you want truth about something, dont use them.

again, did you watch the video? example of a website updating to prove it happened: twitter recently added 2 more badges, gray/grey badges for politicians and gold badges for businesses. politicians get them free, businesses have to pay a whole lotta money (unless if they're one of the most successful businesses ever)

1. i dont need to when i have a memory and a brain. 2. how is twitter relevant? 3. photoshop exists and sites like photopea.com are free. bye

OrphanGenerator
Daniil_Tate wrote:
OrphanGenerator wrote:
Daniil_Tate wrote:
OrphanGenerator wrote:
Daniil_Tate wrote:
OrphanGenerator wrote:
Daniil_Tate wrote:
OrphanGenerator wrote:
Daniil_Tate wrote:

notice how it still isnt his site

im not sure what ur talking about but this is the official site of the war room which is led by mr tate

funny because i have the war room and the 41 tenets on another tab open and it doesnt say anything like that

did you even watch the video

thats the defense? i read directly from the source. i dont need to watch the video

just looked at the website, it looks like it was updated since the video was uploaded to get rid of the female manipulation part (and to make the site look nicer, which worked imo)

maybe why the site doesnt have it now is because it never had it. ive had the site open alongside my email and youtube for weeks. it never had any of that. thats the problem with your middlemen. they twist the truth for their convenience. middlemen do this all the time. thats how chernobyl happened. if you want truth about something, dont use them.

again, did you watch the video? example of a website updating to prove it happened: twitter recently added 2 more badges, gray/grey badges for politicians and gold badges for businesses. politicians get them free, businesses have to pay a whole lotta money (unless if they're one of the most successful businesses ever)

1. i dont need to when i have a memory and a brain. 2. how is twitter relevant? 3. photoshop exists and sites like photopea.com are free. bye

1. your memory failed you. 2. twitter is relevant because it's proof websites can indeed update. 3. this is one of the most trusted commentary youtubers out there, zero controversies in any way in recent memory. im sure that if someone who used the site noticed that there was info on there not normally there they would have exposed him. 4. want me to pull up archive.org or internet archive or wayback machine?

Daniil_Yakovlev
OrphanGenerator wrote:
Daniil_Tate wrote:
OrphanGenerator wrote:
Daniil_Tate wrote:
OrphanGenerator wrote:
Daniil_Tate wrote:
OrphanGenerator wrote:
Daniil_Tate wrote:
OrphanGenerator wrote:
Daniil_Tate wrote:

notice how it still isnt his site

im not sure what ur talking about but this is the official site of the war room which is led by mr tate

funny because i have the war room and the 41 tenets on another tab open and it doesnt say anything like that

did you even watch the video

thats the defense? i read directly from the source. i dont need to watch the video

just looked at the website, it looks like it was updated since the video was uploaded to get rid of the female manipulation part (and to make the site look nicer, which worked imo)

maybe why the site doesnt have it now is because it never had it. ive had the site open alongside my email and youtube for weeks. it never had any of that. thats the problem with your middlemen. they twist the truth for their convenience. middlemen do this all the time. thats how chernobyl happened. if you want truth about something, dont use them.

again, did you watch the video? example of a website updating to prove it happened: twitter recently added 2 more badges, gray/grey badges for politicians and gold badges for businesses. politicians get them free, businesses have to pay a whole lotta money (unless if they're one of the most successful businesses ever)

1. i dont need to when i have a memory and a brain. 2. how is twitter relevant? 3. photoshop exists and sites like photopea.com are free. bye

1. your memory failed you. 2. twitter is relevant because it's proof websites can indeed update. 3. this is one of the most trusted commentary youtubers out there, zero controversies in any way in recent memory. im sure that if someone who used the site noticed that there was info on there not normally there they would have exposed him. 4. want me to pull up archive.org or internet archive or wayback machine?

1. my memory did not, i just have critical thinking skills. 2. speaking of critical thinking, lets assume you are right. lets say he did say all that on his site. why would he remove it now? the matrix already attacked him. he crossed the rubicon and is now completely uncensored. he has no real incentive to censor anyhow. why would he do it now? tell me

OrphanGenerator
Daniil_Tate wrote:
OrphanGenerator wrote:
Daniil_Tate wrote:
OrphanGenerator wrote:
Daniil_Tate wrote:
OrphanGenerator wrote:
Daniil_Tate wrote:
OrphanGenerator wrote:
Daniil_Tate wrote:
OrphanGenerator wrote:
Daniil_Tate wrote:

notice how it still isnt his site

im not sure what ur talking about but this is the official site of the war room which is led by mr tate

funny because i have the war room and the 41 tenets on another tab open and it doesnt say anything like that

did you even watch the video

thats the defense? i read directly from the source. i dont need to watch the video

just looked at the website, it looks like it was updated since the video was uploaded to get rid of the female manipulation part (and to make the site look nicer, which worked imo)

maybe why the site doesnt have it now is because it never had it. ive had the site open alongside my email and youtube for weeks. it never had any of that. thats the problem with your middlemen. they twist the truth for their convenience. middlemen do this all the time. thats how chernobyl happened. if you want truth about something, dont use them.

again, did you watch the video? example of a website updating to prove it happened: twitter recently added 2 more badges, gray/grey badges for politicians and gold badges for businesses. politicians get them free, businesses have to pay a whole lotta money (unless if they're one of the most successful businesses ever)

1. i dont need to when i have a memory and a brain. 2. how is twitter relevant? 3. photoshop exists and sites like photopea.com are free. bye

1. your memory failed you. 2. twitter is relevant because it's proof websites can indeed update. 3. this is one of the most trusted commentary youtubers out there, zero controversies in any way in recent memory. im sure that if someone who used the site noticed that there was info on there not normally there they would have exposed him. 4. want me to pull up archive.org or internet archive or wayback machine?

1. my memory did not, i just have critical thinking skills. 2. speaking of critical thinking, lets assume you are right. lets say he did say all that on his site. why would he remove it now? the matrix already attacked him. he crossed the rubicon and is now completely uncensored. he has no real incentive to censor anyhow. why would he do it now? tell me

he would remove it now because he's being charged for sex crimes against women, and that part right there would be an instant gg ez. you didn't ask this, but i know you will soon, so let's get it out of the way now: why would he put it on the site to begin with? his target audience with hustlers university is men who either have self esteem issues or want to stay in an echo chamber of being constantly hyped up who aren't doing very well in life. he wants to make them feel like they're a part of something special that makes them better than everyone else because if he doesn't they will quickly realize it's a scam and will immediately cancel their subscriptions. one easy way to do this is to take a large group of people, preferably one tatey boy already hates, and make them seem like they're inferior to the men in the group. since he already had the webcam business going, he might as well pick women and advertise it to get potential members already feeling superior. it's business. dirty, but then again, business is dirty

HimalayanSaltLampLicker

WIN EVERY CHESS GAME WITH THIS OPEINING ----> https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/3000-elo-opening-found

Daniil_Yakovlev
Daniil_Tate wrote:

he would remove it now because he's being charged for sex crimes against women, and that part right there would be an instant gg ez. you didn't ask this, but i know you will soon, so let's get it out of the way now: why would he put it on the site to begin with? his target audience with hustlers university is men who either have self esteem issues or want to stay in an echo chamber of being constantly hyped up who aren't doing very well in life. he wants to make them feel like they're a part of something special that makes them better than everyone else because if he doesn't they will quickly realize it's a scam and will immediately cancel their subscriptions. one easy way to do this is to take a large group of people, preferably one tatey boy already hates, and make them seem like they're inferior to the men in the group. since he already had the webcam business going, he might as well pick women and advertise it to get potential members already feeling superior. it's business. dirty, but then again, business is dirty

1. no changes happened on the sites when he was arrested. 2. where is your source for any of this? some doctored report? tate donates millions to womens charities while youre sitting around argueing on chess.com. 3. if you want to flip burgers for the rest of your life, cool. but dont attack us because we dont want to

Daniil_Yakovlev

in short, your evidence, if it can even be called that is sloppy at best. now get back to chess, this isnt twitter

OrphanGenerator
Daniil_Tate wrote:
Daniil_Tate wrote:

he would remove it now because he's being charged for sex crimes against women, and that part right there would be an instant gg ez. you didn't ask this, but i know you will soon, so let's get it out of the way now: why would he put it on the site to begin with? his target audience with hustlers university is men who either have self esteem issues or want to stay in an echo chamber of being constantly hyped up who aren't doing very well in life. he wants to make them feel like they're a part of something special that makes them better than everyone else because if he doesn't they will quickly realize it's a scam and will immediately cancel their subscriptions. one easy way to do this is to take a large group of people, preferably one tatey boy already hates, and make them seem like they're inferior to the men in the group. since he already had the webcam business going, he might as well pick women and advertise it to get potential members already feeling superior. it's business. dirty, but then again, business is dirty

1. no changes happened on the sites when he was arrested. 2. where is your source for any of this? some doctored report? tate donates millions to womens charities while youre sitting around argueing on chess.com. 3. if you want to flip burgers for the rest of your life, cool. but dont attack us because we dont want to

1. source? 2. its speculation. in truth, i have no idea why he put that on there, that just makes him look like someone you shouldn't support. also proof tate donated anything to anyone?

This forum topic has been locked