Another how to improve thread, with a (long) story by a new member

Sort:
boyersj

My strength:

I am a former beginning, approaching intermediate player 24 years ago. Last USCF rating was/is 1271, with 32 rated games played I haven’t played in a tournament since 1993; other than some random pickup games with some friends who have never played tournaments themselves.

 

My History:

Prior to 1992 I knew how the pieces moved, but had no idea how to win at chess prior to meeting the high school chess coach. I had played some with my dad, who always beat me so I had that level of interest of learning how to play. Our High School was small (I graduated with 98) so it was not a developed club, but one that would often times not have a team compete. Since I had some level of interest he got me into playing, and we ended up with a club of 4 players to have a team.

 

Our first qualifying tournament for the state tournament, were my first rated matches in April 1992.

I don’t remember the details of that tournament but my provisional rating after that tournament was 1188. The state championships, which we somehow barely qualified to participate I won 1 and lost 4, and my rating dropped to 1140. Then that year we went to the national scholastic high school tournament in Lexington in May, 1992. I went 3-0-4 and my rating went up to 1237. I finished 69th in the U1300 division. While we were there I bought my first chess set and my first chess book. It was End Game Course by Bruce Pandolfini.

 

The following year, I became first chair (yes, our team was pretty weak) with that rating. I read the book on the bus ride home from school and become strong enough to beat my chess coach (I would estimate his rating at that time to be around 1150 – 1200). The regional qualifier was eliminated and all teams went to the state tournament. Playing first board, I got beat badly again, going 1-4-0. My rating dropped to 1213. I went to the national chess tournament alone, since it was in Dallas and the team couldn’t drive. I went 4-0-3 and ended up 26th in the u1300 division. My rating as mentioned earlier went up to 1271.

 

My time away:

Graduating and going to college and then career etc caused me to put chess down, and until I watched Netflix documentary of Magnus Carlsen, I hadn’t even thought about playing serious. I just played when someone would bring it up and I would pack my old chess board. Now I am ready to devote myself to some unknown degree due to loss of interest in other hobbies. I lost all of my chess stuff (books, notation pad, etc. except my vinyl board and wood pieces I bought in Lexington.

 

Current status:

I am rusty but playing some rapid games on here and a few OTB with a friend of similar strength I am getting the dust off my game. I also reached out and contacted the local chess club, and will be attending a meeting very soon. So I look like a valuable member I bought a clock, a bag, and a new notation pad, since my old one was lost. I do the daily puzzle and the 5 tactics problems daily.

 

My self critique:

My opening is weak and I use most of my time getting through it without a compromised position as best I can. If I can gain a material advantage I attempt to shorten the middlegame and get to the end game that I feel confident because of my reading of the end game book.

My attacks seem predicated on my opponent making a mistake. I can win when he or she doesn’t make a blunder and if simple combinations are available. My opening lack of knowledge seems to lead to an absence of a plan.

 

My plan to begin improving:

In addition to going to the local club I have ordered the following based on other thread research:

The Amateur’s mind: Turning Chess Misconceptions into Chess Mastery - Silman

How to Reassess Your Chess: Chess Mastery Through Chess Imbalances - Silman

Silman’s Complete Endgame Course: From Beginning to Master

I also got Back to Basics: Openings - Carsten Hansen

 

Based on further reading, I need to practice tactics and since I am in the ordering mood I have the following in my cart but I haven’t purchased because I felt I needed some feedback.

 

The Ultimate Chess Puzzle Book – Emms

Chess: 5334 Problems, Combinations, and Games - Polgar

The Complete Chess workout: Train your brain with 1200 puzzles! - Palliser

My System (Chess Classics) - Nimzowich

Pawn Power in Chess – Hans Kmoch

 

I have about 15-20 hours a week to devote to study/online play

 

My Goal(s):

I would like to hit a 1400 by end of the year, and play in the rated tournaments to track my progress

Stretch goal (3-5 year) is to reach 1600, and be able to feel competent in all phases of the game.

 

My Questions:

Does my stated plan correlate to my strength, my history, and my current status?

If not, do you have a recommendation?

Is the advanced memberships on chess.com better investment than these books?

When I begin getting games OTB to analyze, is the website an adequate resource?

Other than a goal, what am I missing?

 

Thank you for any feedback,

Steve

Cherub_Enjel

I didn't read it all, because it was too long, and a lot of it was irrelevant - your online games here are enough. 

(1) Your openings are fine - in fact, they're the strongest part of your game. You follow principled, positionally correct chess in the opening, and that's more than good enough for you. 

(2) You need to work on your tactics. The positional advantage you often get in the opening becomes useless when tactics start happening. Dropping material to simple tactics and missing mates in 2 under no time pressure, as I've seen, is what will hold you back most. Buy "Back to Basics: Tactics", by Dan Heisman, and study it deeply. *Studying one book deeply is better than reading a ton of books superficially, which is AKA a waste of time*. 

(3) Don't bother with any of the Silman books until you finish Heisman, which should take you at least a month or more, including applying what he says in your games. Specifically, the Amateur's mind and Imbalances are for 1600+ OTB. 

(4) Pawn Power and My System are good books, although you should work on tactics more.

(5) Your goals are reasonable.

(6) You have more than enough resources online to get good at chess. Resources are totally fine.

(7) The biggest mistake that beginners, especially older players make, is getting a lot of useless information and not applying useful information in their games. You should focus on the tactics book, and apply all the stuff in your games. *If you can't apply a piece of knowledge directly in your games to get better results, that knowledge is worth 0*.

 

TLDR : Don't worry about "planning", "positional play", or "strategy" too much. Just focus on following the basic principles (that you're already following pretty nicely in the opening), and work on tactics, and you'll be on the way to 1600 pretty fast (which requires no more positional understanding than you already have, but a lot more tactical skill.) By pretty fast, I mean maybe 3 years max, if you do it right. This is pretty slow improvement, so it should be much faster. 

boyersj

Thank you for the feedback.

I would like to say that I am uncertain if the first few games indicate my play. I started playing 10 min games, and being rusty I always felt I was in a time crunch, so that time control was not conducive for good performance. That being said, I am glad to hear my openings aren't as weak as I feel they are currently. The tactics focus recommendation is consistent with what I have read for my level. I can understand older beginners getting useless information. Since financial resources are less of a constraint. I will amend my pending purchase based on this feedback.

 

jambyvedar

The Ultimate Chess Puzzle Book by Emms is  a good tactic book. If you find the puzzle here too difficult for you, try first Chess Tactics for Champion by Polgar.

Study these book in order. Play all the games on your board. It will take you some time to digest them all. 

 

The Amateur’s mind: Turning Chess Misconceptions into Chess Mastery - Silman

How to Reassess Your Chess: Chess Mastery Through Chess Imbalances - Silman

 

In between these books above, you can also study your endgame and opening book. 

 

 

Cherub_Enjel

Yeah.. Don't do read those books^.

The player recommending them should be 2000+ easily if he/she has digested the material thoroughly from any two of those books, but instead plays rapid at a lower level than you do (checking out the recent rapid games).

Imbalances by silman is a *difficult* book which I didn't finish because I skipped many parts of it because it was too difficult for me. This was back when I was 1900s, and I'm considering trying to read it again at my current level.

Speed chess is hardly a credential.

universityofpawns

My weakness is openings....what helped me was playing daily games (mostly 3 days per move) and looking up the openings in a data base.....daily is different than live in that it is more of an "open book" type of test, you are allowed and expected to look up opening suggested moves in a data base, engine use is still prohibited during the game, but you can use them as an analysis tool later...I think after like 5 years stuck at 1600-1700 that my OTB rating will actually go up now when I can start or find a club near here...

boyersj
Ok so today I went ahead and ordered Dan Heisman's book, it looks good based on feedback and reading preview. I also went ahead with pawn power and my system just to mitigate shipping costs but I will shelve them for now.

So in my mind I should probably focus most of my study time to that book and continue with online tactics problem solving.

I'm an instructor in my other hobby so I understand the train/practice/play philosophy of effective learning.
daxypoo
i am a total novice and op can take this with a grain of salt but i found buying a membership to be beneficial already

i play solely on the iphone/ipad app so i dont have as much customization as the other formats but i find the unlimited tactics trainer (even though i am in the dark regarding a specific motif) to already be paying dividends

having access to the mentor, drills, and videos is also greatly helpful as everything is here in one place

maybe this helps someone in my noobish place better than a more experienced player but to each his own
fieldsofforce

boyersj wrote:

My Questions:

Does my stated plan correlate to my strength, my history, and my current status?

If not, do you have a recommendation?

Is the advanced memberships on chess.com better investment than these books?

When I begin getting games OTB to analyze, is the website an adequate resource?

Other than a goal, what am I missing?

                                                                         _________________

 

Based on your story you are about 43 years old.  You are facing the purchase of expensive ChessBase and emdgame tablebase software.  In addition the purchase of several tactic, strategy, opening, middle  game , and endgame books.  Studying, training, and 2 OTB week end Swiss chess tournaments per month for  the next 2 to  3 years.  After all that you may be at a rating of somewhere between 1900-2000.  You are 46 years old.   If you wish to meet the 3 IM and GM norms you will need a rating of 2500+.  Or maybe you think because of  my age.  I  will continue to play city, state, world open, Las Vegas open, etc. tournaments.  Increasing your rating and may  be cashing where you can.  You will  a 2nd tier Professional Gunslinger.  If you are obsessed with this game like I am.  That is good enough.  Cause damn! 

boyersj
Daxypoo,

I am glad that you provided that insight, I've been under the impression that it's a good tool. I just hadn't seen a strong recommendation in any forum research.

Steve
thegreat_patzer

@force

the OP's ratings goals are reasonable and accessable

OTOH

talking about getting an IM or a GM is about as reasonable as deciding to visit the moon in the next five years.

 

nobody HAS ever gotten an GM/IM while going no further than 1200 as a teenager.

this describes me as well.

instead, as a middle aged man; one should accurately feel that the GM/IM ship has left. IMHO

fieldsofforce

@thegreat_patzer:

nobody HAS ever gotten an GM/IM while going no further than 1200 as a teenager.

this describes me as well.

instead, as a middle aged man; one should accurately feel that the GM/IM ship has left. IMHO

                                                                       _________________________

The OP's post is tltr (too long  too read.)  I agree with you.  But you know deep down in our secret heart of hearts we want to be the exception and turn out to be the best Professional Gunslinger the chess world has ever seen.

Harmbtn

The question of whether or not someone who started as an adult can ever become a titled player comes up constantly, and every time people proclaim that it could be done.

Why is it then, that these players do not exist? Countless late starters become completely obsessed with the game and devote huge amounts of time on it, you'd think there would be at least a few. Find me even a single titled player who started after their teens.

thegreat_patzer

well.  I confess. you are right!

I would love to be no man's patzer and a solid game for anybody! but then life is as it is...

boyersj
Wow, lots of interesting comments!

Force, I've seen your comments on other threads and am glad you stopped by. I don't foresee that level of commitment being feasible due to my variety of responsibilities both professional and domestic.

Why is it difficult to become strong post teenage years? I believe it lies in commitment. During the scholastic years we have the ability to focus our passions acutely. If we haven't dedicated ourselves to a singular passion by our teenage years we have missed that opportunity in life. As we age, we become more responsible and more diverse as people. Becoming a master at anything requires intense focus and dedication.

Some will say that our ability to learn slows down after certain age and I do believe that to have some validity however chess is purely a mental game and because of that I believe the time commitment is more of a limiting reagent than capability.

I do turn 43 later this year and after my stretch goal I'll re evaluate but for now I'll limit my goals to what was stated in the OP. I do apologize for the "Tltr" but I felt anyone who has quit for an extended time or knows someone who had quit for an extended time may be able to relate and give some insight.
thegreat_patzer

then it is very Easy to improve...

just learn how to make the pieces move.  vids, guides, etc are everywhere

Pulpofeira

Joining the club in real life will be a decisive boost for your improvement.

boyersj
Again, thanks for all the feedback! Looks like a membership is my next step in addition to the book purchases I have made.

Seems like many options in books exist but I'm guessing some are equivalents? Such as winning chess tactics by seirawan and back to basics: tactics by heisman?
fieldsofforce
boyersj wrote:
Again, thanks for all the feedback! Looks like a membership is my next step in addition to the book purchases I have made.

Seems like many options in books exist but I'm guessing some are equivalents? Such as winning chess tactics by seirawan and back to basics: tactics by heisman?

Don't forget you have to purchase Chessbase, and an endgame tablebase software,  If you don't purchase Chessbase it will take you 8-10 years to  build an opening tree by hand.  With ChessBase it will tske the computer about 2-3 years to build the opening tree automatically.

boyersj
Chessbase and endgame tablebase, seems things have changed a lot since I used to play.

These seem like a high end tool for expert and beyond. I'm leaning in treading carefully so it doesn't feel like work. That may seem weird to the most passionate of players but I am expert level in my other hobby and it feels like work and why I'm going back to chess. That being said... I'll work hard at it as long as it maintains a level of "fun" as well.