Too merciful. I checkmated him
Another new stupid rule in chess

Wow guys, one of the pro-stalemate wins people here just mentioned in another thread that PERPETUAL CHECK should also be a win!

Guys, I'd appreciate your help in this perpetual thread, which is turning out to be nothing but perpetual insanity. You'll be stunned when you see what the justifications are.

UPDATE: The new justification is that since perpetual check isn't necessarily repetition, so checking the king 10 times in a row is a win

Their retarded logic is that if U check the king 10 times, the king is obviously never finding a safe square, while every move, the king is finding a safe square. They are basically saying that in a queen vs queen and pawn endgame, the lone queen can win by checking the king 10 times in a row.

Their retarded logic is that if U check the king 10 times, the king is obviously never finding a safe square, while every move, the king is finding a safe square. They are basically saying that in a queen vs queen and pawn endgame, the lone queen can win by checking the king 10 times in a row.
So some nutcases think perpetual check should be a win. Since when is it newsworthy that nutcases have nutty opinions?

It's not the fact that it's a board game, it's the logic behind these claims that stuns me. The lack of common sense is what shocks me, not whether they agree with the rules or not.

Relax, it is just a board game after all. No one should consider chess more than that.
Not if money is involved.

Chess doesn't have alot of money in it.
Fellas Fellas....if you're in the area, lemme know!
https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/chess-tournament7

Relax, it is just a board game after all. No one should consider chess more than that.
Not if money is involved.
In chess you have to be a Top 5 world class player if you want to make good money.
If you are not one of the best players in the world you will have to survive by writing blogs and giving lessons to kids.
Choosing chess as a profession in the worst idea ever. Torture yourself for years and have nothing in return.
I like how when I pointed out a serious problem in his arguments, he just left. Typical