Also what if you drop a piece during a game and it's quite far and you don't have any other pieces nearby , do you PAUSE a clock and go get it OR you can't touch a click and it's your problem?
Answer only if you know new FIDE official BLITZ rules please
Sort:
🤔
⏳
Oct 23, 2017
0
#5
.......................................................................................
If you play an illegal move but don't press the clock you can undo it. If you play the illegal move with a piece that can't play a legal move then you don't have to play it.
If in this position I took the queen with the knight see that is it is an illegal move so undo it before pressing the clock. I can then move my king.
ESP-918 a écrit :
Also what if you drop a piece during a game and it's quite far and you don't have any other pieces nearby , do you PAUSE a clock and go get it OR you can't touch a click and it's your problem?
I don't actually know the rules but I think that you can't pause the clock.
#6
What the heck are you talking about mate? Totally random example , we are talking about completely different thing. Did you watch the video? Obviously you didn't. ..
You don't say when the incident happens
That is what I understood from your message
Oct 23, 2017
0
#11
I think he is talking about the end where a spectator told him he made an illegal move and he moved it to an appropriate square after he had already pushed his clock and during his opponents turn. At least I think that’s what happened. If that is the case I don’t see what the point of this thread is seeing how the video ends at that moment which I think means the game ended because the guy who made the illegal move lost. Unless of course the game did continue and they just stopped the video to confuse us.
Daybreak57 a écrit :
I think he is talking about the end where a spectator told him he made an illegal move and he moved it to an appropriate square after he had already pushed his clock and during his opponents turn. At least I think that’s what happened. If that is the case I don’t see what the point of this thread is seeing how the video ends at that moment which I think means the game ended because the guy who made the illegal move lost. Unless of course the game did continue and they just stopped the video to confuse us.
Thanks for explaining. The question was unclear to me the way he said it so I talked about he closest plausible senario. So I guess the answer to the question is either that :
-It was already played so there was no illegal move.
-Nobody bothered claiming illegal move because it was already won.
Oct 23, 2017
0
#13
The second the piece is released the move must be played if it is a legal move.
Had the move been illegal but the clock had not been pressed then he could have made a different move.
Also, that was not a “spectator” but rather an arbiter, who’s job is to do exactly as he did.
Had the move been illegal but the clock had not been pressed then he could have made a different move.
Also, that was not a “spectator” but rather an arbiter, who’s job is to do exactly as he did.
Oct 23, 2017
0
#14
Daybreak57 hat geschrieben:
I think he is talking about the end where a spectator told him he made an illegal move and he moved it to an appropriate square after he had already pushed his clock and during his opponents turn.
that's not what happened. he didn' make an illegal move. he let go of his king but then realized that there's a knight fork and wanted to move his king somewhere else. the arbiter (not just a spectator) told him that he let go of the king and that he has to make the bad move. his opponent then plays the winning move and he resigns.
afaik if you let go of a piece and then move it somewhere else is not an automatic loss. just like touching a piece and then moving another piece is not an automatic loss either. if the arbiter sees it or your opponent protests, you will have to make the original move (and maybe get a time penalty). but i think it's not an automatic loss. but i don't know the specific rule in the fide rule book.
#14
You missed one VERY IMPORTANT thing!
After releasing his hand from the piece he moves again and PRESSES the clock. In that case because he already made a move (let go his hand) , then makes it ANOTHER move which is illegal (because he already made a move remember? Letting go his hand ) AND then presses the clock ( confirms an illegal move).
Should be considered a lost .
This video is not about an illegal move.
He lost because he resigned after he blundered his rook.
Dale wrote:
This video is not about an illegal move.
He lost because he resigned after he blundered his rook.
He made a move, then made ANOTHER ONE , THEN PRESSED the clock. After he pressed a clock another guy's time started running like 2 seconds been used and ONLY THEN arbiter said you must select your FIRST move , they continued like nothing happened BUT BUT BUT the guy already lost 2 seconds of his time WTF why should he? Because indian fella made a move which is ILLEGAL (BECAUSE he ALREADY made a move and let go his hand and after that any other move is absolutely illegal as long as first move was legal which it was , so after he moves AGAIN remember his move already been done once he let go his hand , moves again and presses the clock!!!
The white guy should of stoped the clock pause and call arbiter to say he made a double TWO moves which is against the rules and makes it illegal and in a blitz match he can claim a win.
Oct 23, 2017
0
#18
Those Indian fellas again! Yeah, Blitz is weird, a totally different game than classical almost. I don't know about FIDE, but in USCF rules you don't even have to say check and if the other guy doesn't see the check you can actually just capture the King on the next move and win!
ESP-918 wrote:
He made a move, then made ANOTHER ONE , THEN PRESSED the clock. After he pressed a clock another guy's time started running like 2 seconds been used and ONLY THEN arbiter said you must select your FIRST move , they continued like nothing happened BUT BUT BUT the guy already lost 2 seconds of his time WTF why should he?
You need to look at the video again. he makes a move and re;leases his hand, then tries to make the king move a different one. He did not press the clock after this because the arbiter stepped in and corrected what would have been an illegal move. Only then does he try to press the clock.
The arbiter correctly tells him the king must remain on its first square and the opponent immediately continues play. Arbiter handled this quickly. There was no illegal move because the arbiter prevented it from happening.
Lagomorph wrote:
ESP-918 wrote:
He made a move, then made ANOTHER ONE , THEN PRESSED the clock. After he pressed a clock another guy's time started running like 2 seconds been used and ONLY THEN arbiter said you must select your FIRST move , they continued like nothing happened BUT BUT BUT the guy already lost 2 seconds of his time WTF why should he?
You need to look at the video again. he makes a move and re;leases his hand, then tries to make the king move a different one. He did not press the clock after this because the arbiter stepped in and corrected what would have been an illegal move. Only then does he try to press the clock.
The arbiter correctly tells him the king must remain on its first square and the opponent immediately continues play. Arbiter handled this quickly. There was no illegal move because the arbiter prevented it from happening.
I think you need to look at the video again not me, as he clearly DID PRESS a clock and only the arbiter asked him to change his move back to the original.
Gosh ....some people need to be more focused here
https://youtu.be/WIkcImxMGhg
He let go his hand, BUT didn't press the clock yet !
He lost automatically right? If yes , then why his opponent just didn't pause the clock and called it a game (I mean after referee return a move back, the guy continue playing fork him, why? Illegal move already been done he doesn't need to continue fork etc play on, he could just stop the click isn't it? As indian fella already pressed a clock)
Anyway tell me more how it should be and PLEASE remember FIDE RULES ONLY I'm interested in , thx.