Anti evolution forum. Everybodys welcome.

My other forum got blocked so lets start over and be more careful. Especially me

Hi best kid in school 

That dint take long

@BestKidInSchool Please don't spam forum topics with nonsense. I am deleting those posts.

@trump2020maga1 As this is the same topic as the other thread, those warnings still apply. If you don't keep it within the forum rules, it will be immediately locked, and you'll have to take the conversation into a private club like Open Discussion instead of the public forums.

Thanks,

David, moderator

Should be going to Fair and Open Discussion.

I thought I was in the rules because  i was not advertise my personal religion. I call it faith not Christianity and said designer instead of God. I thought all that was aloud as long as I was not advertising one religion

But then I won't have as much people involved in it 

It's not just advertising what you personally believe in, it's the discussion of politics and/or religion that is not allowed in the public forums: replacing one set of terms with another set terms does not change the nature or essential content of the topic.

If someone tries to start up a discussion on either of those two topics, tell them it's not allowed in the public forums but you'd be happy to discuss it with them via PM or in the private club of your choice. Don't try to engage with the discussion and if they persist, you must block them, at least temporarily, so they get the message. If you force the moderators to intervene, our simplest option will be to lock the thread, so if you don't want to that to happen, you're going to need to alter your original policy of "I am not going to block anyone, ever".

Thanks,

David, moderator

To describe people as antievolutionists is to identify them more by what they don’t believe than by what they do. Such a description implies that their positive claims are in fact secondary to their negative ones, that their primary concern is not to promote their account of life but to cast doubt on evolution.

The creation–evolution controversy (also termed the creation vs. evolution debate or the origins debate) involves an ongoing, recurring cultural, political, and theological dispute about the origins of the Earth, of humanity, and of other life. Creationism was once widely believed to be true, but since the mid-19th century evolution by natural selection has been established as an empirical scientific fact.

The debate is religious, not scientific: in the scientific community, evolution is accepted as fact^[1] and efforts to sustain the traditional view are almost universally regarded as pseudoscience.^[2][3][4][5] While the controversy has a long history,^[6][7] today it has retreated to be mainly over what constitutes good science education,^[8][9] with the politics of creationism primarily focusing on the teaching of creationism in public education.^{[10][11][12][13][14]} Among majority-Christian countries, the debate is most prominent in the United States,^[15] where it may be portrayed as part of a culture war.^[16] Parallel controversies also exist in some other religious communities, such as the more fundamentalist branches of Judaism^[17] and Islam.^[18] In Europe and elsewhere, creationism is less widespread (notably, the Catholic Church and Anglican Communion both accept evolution), and there is much less pressure to teach it as fact.^[19] 

^{"The debate is religious, not scientific:"}

^{Your thread is doomed to failure, as you are but inviting a religious debate.} 

Not true in the least.

Difference is this OP has an agenda and invites religious discussion. I argue all the time in Elroch's thread, against many conclusions drawn from Darwinian thought. 

Presenting any type of evidence to someone who adheres to an "Anti" philosophy is quite pointless, They are not about to listen, much less rationally discuss. Besides, it appears evident the OP is but trolling for negative attention by his posts here and elsewhere. 

Just as it should be. Evolution is a well established fact. All efforts to provide evidence against it have failed   for the last 150 years.

It's the foundation of medicine,agriculture,and a host of other biology related industries. So,more than any other field,responsible for the health and well being of the planet's population. 

No its not. There is a lot of evidence against it and I know a lot of people who disagree with evolution 

That's been my experience 

Just recently they found a new species of whale. And almost in every decades they found a new species in the wild. These species were not exist in the past centuries and suddenly it emerge.

It seems that the evolution process is not take a long time period to happening.

We could check the new species that emerge in our lifetime existence and comparing it with the currently existing species. And measure its probable time period it was needed to evolve. Perhaps it would give a conclusion of fast evolution.

It is only the human factor that pretty much influencing the selection of the new or the old species to be always exist in this modern days. I thought the species extinction in the ancient time is faster because the prey-hunter relationship and a lot of catastrophic events.

How did the reproduction organs evolve? You need them to evolve them