Anyone miss descriptive notation?

Sort:
Avatar of batgirl

Descriptive notation, old-style (from a French Calabrian published in 1714, "Le Jeu des Eschets, Tratuit de l'Italien de Gioachino Greco, Calabrois.")

null
null

Avatar of batgirl

Some really nice algebraic from 1833 France: "Le jeu des échecs: parties de Joachim Grecco dit Le Calabrois"  by Moyse Azevedo


null

Avatar of PawnosaurusRex

Interesting. I wonder when the letter "s" took its modern form.

 

Avatar of batgirl

German algebraic from "Unterricht für schachspieler" 1795

null

Avatar of batgirl

Italian descriptive from "Osservazioni teorico-pratiche sopra il giuoco degli scacchi" by Giovanni Battista Lolli, 1763

null

Avatar of Ziryab
batgirl wrote:

Descriptive notation, old-style (from a French Calabrian published in 1714, "Le Jeu des Eschets, Tratuit de l'Italien de Gioachino Greco, Calabrois.")

 

 

+1

Keep the history coming.

Avatar of iCatalan

I prefer descriptive notion when thinking of moves and playing them out in my head but prefer algebraic when reading or writing down as less error but disadvantages are is harder to think in your head the older method far easier as it tells you the side piece and file straight away without thinking also rank as 8 is 1 and 1 is 8 depending what side you’re playing the old system allway 1-8 just easier I know both well and say learning both is best

Avatar of Ziryab

I used descriptive for many years before learning algebraic in the 1990s. Algebraic is far easier. To stay fresh, I wrote out from memory a game that I played using descriptive for White and algebraic for Black.

1.P-K4 e5 2.N-KB3 Nc6 3.B-N5 g6 4.P-B3 and so on.

Avatar of Ziryab

Black's moves are illegal

Avatar of Sred
batgirl wrote:

Here's chess notation for you:

 

I actually can't figure that out. Giving up before losing too much life time.

Avatar of Optimissed

I also started with descriptive and switched to short-form algebraic. It's much quicker, easier, more logical and completely unambiguous. I still know some players who continue to use descriptive in club matches.

Avatar of Lagomorph

Woollensock's next opponent is trying to work out where QB6 is......

Avatar of Lagomorph

QB4 ?

 

Avatar of OldPatzerMike

I started out with descriptive notation in 1969. Just about all available books used it in those days. By 1971, I had discovered Chess Informant and, realizing the logic of algebraic notation, started using it to record my OTB games. I still prefer algebraic but have no problem studying books that use descriptive.

Avatar of Capabotvikhine

I like both. 

Avatar of MSteen

I started to learn in the mid 60s, and all my early books (and many of the later ones) were descriptive. When algebraic came in and took over, it was a breath of fresh air. I always got lost with descriptive, frequently moving the kingside piece instead of the queenside, and having to start over at the beginning.  I hated it then, and I still do.

Whenever I have been able to, I have replaced my old descriptive books with updated algebraic ones (assuming they are available). 

Avatar of Lagomorph
ghost_of_pushwood wrote:

She always has that Queen Purse!  (I wonder what's in it.)

 

The keys to the Tower dungeons.  Ask Andrew.

Avatar of SeniorPatzer

Fischer recorded his OTB games in Descriptive Notation.

Avatar of DrSpudnik

And in terrible handwriting.

Avatar of Capabotvikhine

We should hold a beauty pageant for miss descriptive notation. I will volunteer to be a judge for the bikini portion of the contest.