Your puzzle rating is tremendously well for your rapid . For most people it's usually a 600-700 point difference between their chess and tactic ratings . I am assuming you haven't played real people for quite some time now and that 720 rating may not be indicative of what your real strength is . It's probably a lot higher than that I guess .
I would definitely encourage you to play real people instead of the bots . A computer isn't going to provide you with a good simulation of how games work at a certain rating range . The computer you play at 1400 is just stockfish programmed to make X number of blunders per game or say per 20 moves . And as you increase the bot's rating , that X is going to decrease as well .
Also by the way , it's not a surprising phenomenon to be able to do extremely well in tactics but fail to see them during games . You see when you are solving a puzzle , your brain already knows you need to look for something . During a real game you don't know when to search for a tactic , and your mind is already preoccupied with other details and plans .
Additionally, I find it very difficult to get into correct positions or see possible tactics when I play the computer. The best I’ve been able to beat is the 1400 rated model.
Is it possible I’m just chessed out and need a break? Should I spend more time on lessons so I can put a name to the tactic? Should I just play real people?
Any advice would be welcome.