C'mon, now I'm hungry, too!
A.R.B. Chess System
Sort:
Jan 24, 2015
0
#43
That Arby's guy (mmmmm, Arby's...hungry, hungry...) is getting to be more of a pain in the **** than the Indian Prince guy...
I'm actually tempted to make a bet for how many accounts this fool will make before he finally gives up. Seriously, it's a waste of his time and a waste of space.
Dude he's easily in the hundreds.
Jan 24, 2015
0
#46
drybasin wrote:
I'm actually tempted to make a bet for how many accounts this fool will make before he finally gives up. Seriously, it's a waste of his time and a waste of space.
Well, unless he's used the ARB system to crack the secret of immortality, he has to die one of these years...
MSC157 wrote:
Yes, he spam his games (more or less the same one) all over the chess internet, take a look, Rybkaforum, Open-Chess... However, the point is that engine has fixed amount of time to think (1 min per move) and lots of other stupid rules... Well, I'm sure this game was pre-arranged because no engine nowadays does mistakes like this.
Check this forum. I do not know whether SuperScream is the same guy but his Hippo opening looks like the ARB system, does it not?
I actually is, I think, although I'm not expert in those "bullet openings". :)
Haha, ISB, I think you will be banned before you manage to leak some others photos. ;)
Basically the ARB system is a strategic method in which the human player from White or Black sets up a weird position avoiding Opening Theory for that is the computer or machines' advantage. It is almost a gambit. The player from whichever side offers to keep the game a closed pawn position which will make it much more difficult for the computer to deal with. I've seen IM MEsserman use this system before in Live Chess against Computer 4-Impossible to Beat. I do not have recollection of him winning. But I know Computer 4 was always in Time trouble since their were no increments. Against a human opponent though, most humans would not be afraid to Open the game force exchanges. In this case, it would seem that your chances against a decent opponent are worse than a 3000+ rated engine. My only question is: How well would a chess engine do if the time controls were Classical instead of Blitz or Bullet?
ARBGenius0017 wrote:
The A.R.B Chess System - Silicon Proof!
Stockfish on the opening
White should have won.
Here is Stockfish playing itself after move 10.
Jan 26, 2015
0
#55
Bronco70 wrote:
Silicon POOF!
Check the diagram, no Queens on the board.
I really do believe I lost brain cells watching some of his "videos" on there. Please remove the link to spare everyone else from this misery. Besides, I'm pretty sure it's not allowed to link to spam (which those videos qualify as in my head, because they're so bad).
So, A.R.B. stands for Anthony R. Brown, does it not?
drybasin, you sure lost some brain cells. I did it to. I mean, what the...?! 
bagahc, yep, that's correct. Huh.
Yes, he spam his games (more or less the same one) all over the chess internet, take a look, Rybkaforum, Open-Chess... However, the point is that engine has fixed amount of time to think (1 min per move) and lots of other stupid rules... Well, I'm sure this game was pre-arranged because no engine nowadays does mistakes like this.