Are you risky?
Sort:
MikeMauu
4 days ago
0
#1
In my experience, most people who are reckless, unless they are skilled, the game does not end in their own way. This opinion is no longer about chess 🥲
4 days ago
0
#2
“Risky” sounds like a little unnecessary danger and this is manageable, but perhaps not that great in chess. “Reckless” sounds even worse for chess. You have to play the needs of the chess position. If the position is good for an attack, then you attack and if it is good for patience, then you play patiently.
I will say though, there’s a related element of “ambition” instead of recklessness and I notice that many of the better chess players also play ambitiously. They go into the best moves and variations with less fear of not finding the correct path. I recommend playing chess ambitiously too, but not necessarily recklessly.
Just play the first 2 moves in random sometimes, it will make you have a good game knowledge.
4 days ago
0
#4
Sometimes I’m risky, just to see what’ll happen. Like I’ll sometimes sac a bishop to open a pawn line (I think they call it Greek gift.
A lot of the time it doesn’t work out, but it’s fun to experiment every now and again.
I certainly pay against a lot of aggressive players which intimidated me at first, but not so much now.
A lot of the time it doesn’t work out, but it’s fun to experiment every now and again.
I certainly pay against a lot of aggressive players which intimidated me at first, but not so much now.
4 days ago
0
#5
Once the analysis said the best move was to sacrifice a knight in the middle game so now I always look for ways to sacrifice it 😂
