A picture is worth a thousand words. Note the WFM in 7th place, behind a bunch of triple digit players.
The design of Arenas are that anyone can win them, regardless of rating.
A picture is worth a thousand words. Note the WFM in 7th place, behind a bunch of triple digit players.
The design of Arenas are that anyone can win them, regardless of rating.
A picture is worth a thousand words. Note the WFM in 7th place, behind a bunch of triple digit players.
The design of Arenas are that anyone can win them, regardless of rating.
That may be the design, but it doesn't work in practice. A sandbagging player has a better chance than anyone.
Play some arena tournaments and you'll see I'm right.
That may be the design, but it doesn't work in practice. A sandbagging player has a better chance than anyone.
Play some arena tournaments and you'll see I'm right.
I almost always play in Arenas, unless I'm just doing a quick test of something. And the top of the leaderboards, when I stick around are mixed. But they're doing what they are designed to do and lower rated players win them.
If someone is clearly sandbagging, they should be reported.
That may be the design, but it doesn't work in practice. A sandbagging player has a better chance than anyone.
Play some arena tournaments and you'll see I'm right.
I almost always play in Arenas, unless I'm just doing a quick test of something. And the top of the leaderboards, when I stick around are mixed. But they're doing what they are designed to do and lower rated players win them.
If someone is clearly sandbagging, they should be reported.
I have. Nothing happens, and that's understandable. How do you differentiate between a sandbagger and a player who had a bad day then has a really good day?
A picture is worth a thousand words. Note the WFM in 7th place, behind a bunch of triple digit players.