Beat A National Master


Wtf was 36. Ne4??
I asked, he said he thought there was a tactical combination that gave him the outpost.

Game of a 2000, annotations of a 100.
You played very well, though.
lol, you couldn't have done better.

Well play SCM but... if you beating these guys pretty regular, why are you not master level too?!
Getting there slowly, mate.

superchessmachine, the real question is if he hadn't resigned after he'd blundered, would you be able to pull out the win? Because honestly I think you just won because he blundered. Then again, I probably shouldn't be talking lol

superchessmachine, the real question is if he hadn't resigned after he'd blundered, would you be able to pull out the win? Because honestly I think you just won because he blundered. Then again, I probably shouldn't be talking lol
I had that EXACT same thought. So I played it against Stockfish Level 10 and won.

Good game. I don't care how you legitimately won; a win is a win and that was a strong opponent. As of now, I've only beaten 1950-ish players in rated games, but never won against an opponent as high as what you just won there - good game (although I have won a few against tougher opponents in unrated games). That was solid play on your part and the win was well earned.
On a side note, what was this tactic that gives them the outpost I wonder? Whenever you sacrifice material, you must ask yourself: "What happens if my opponent takes it?" I think your opponent just dropped a piece and didn't want to admit it was that simple. xD