Best strategy for (beginner's) improvement

Sort:
orthodox70

Hello. I have been playing chess for about 10 months. I love it (and Chess.com), but being middle-aged and having never played before, I have no misconceptions about becoming "great" (or even good, for that matter). But, I would like to be progressive and purposeful in my strategy and tactics.

 

My present rating is a measly (~) 620 in Blitz and (~) 1100 in Daily, but the only game plan I know for improving is continuing to practice Tactics, present rating (~) 725, and playing games. What I'd appreciate feedback on is forming a game plan (not just a game "wing-it") for improvement.

 

Some questions, which may be appropriate:

1) Which type of game(s) ought I be playing?

2) Is it helpful to read books at this stage? If so, any suggestions?

3) What's the best way to learn from a game, ie specific habits for making the most of a win or loss?

4) Is one's rating really the best way to analyze the strength/weakness of one's games? If not, what other indicators give one a good sense of where one stands and where to go from 'here?'

5) What is a reasonable goal for a beginning player with zero previous experience?

 

Thank you very much for your thoughts,

Hayes

 

poodle_noodle
orthodox70 wrote:

Some questions, which may be appropriate:

1) Which type of game(s) ought I be playing?

Ideally OTB (over the board) tournament games with time controls at least 60 minutes for each side... but ok, you're not looking to be world champ right happy.png so it's up to you. Keep it fun! But also the slower the better. Slow time controls are good because you need time to attempt to work new knowledge and skills into your game. Speed games are more about using the ideas and patters you're already very familiar with.

Is it impossible to improve only playing blitz? No. Can blitz be good for trying out new openings? Sure. But in general the longer the better if what you want is improvement.

 

2) Is it helpful to read books at this stage? If so, any suggestions?

An annotated game collection book or tactics book would be best IMO.

Game collection: 
https://www.amazon.com/Masters-Chessboard-Modern-chess-masterpieces/dp/0713457457


Tactics: 
https://www.amazon.com/Back-Basics-Tactics-ChessCafe-Chess/dp/1888690348



3) What's the best way to learn from a game, ie specific habits for making the most of a win or loss?

What I used to do was highlight my 2 biggest mistakes, (I would literally print out the PGN and get a highlighter lol) and save the game for future review. Once you have about 10 games, see if any of the mistakes are the same type. For example maybe you're often missing your opponent's knight forks. Then you can strategize on how you might solve this. Maybe notice that two pieces on opposite colors can't be forked by a knight.

Also pay attention to any positions where you were really confused for what move to make. Ask other players, an engine, reference materials, or something else, but try to find an answer to those positions. You'll notice some common solutions like "improve your worst placed piece when you're not sure what to do."

 

4) Is one's rating really the best way to analyze the strength/weakness of one's games? If not, what other indicators give one a good sense of where one stands and where to go from 'here?'

Ratings definitely don't tell the whole story. Some basic areas of study:
Openings, strategy, tactics, endgames

There are also basic skills like calculation and time management. Many different combinations can bring players to the same rating.

That being said, in general ratings below 1600 or so should be sure not to neglect tactics. In general you can focus on your weakest area when you want to improve, but some base level of tactical ability is foundational and necessary, so going for that first is never bad.  

 

5) What is a reasonable goal for a beginning player with zero previous experience?

Lose 100 slow games (meaning not blitz or bullet). Haha, seriously, that would be my first goal for a totally new player happy.png

Or less negatively I suppose, just play 100 games. In the beginning you have to play to get a feel for how the pieces interact and get used to trying to visualize moves.

As for rating, some people will probably say this is too slow, but because you're not a kid with 8 hours a day to spend on chess, I will say 100 points a year. Would you be able to do more? Sure, but I wouldn't want to suggest something really hard and then have you be disappointed if you fail.

In general the "secret" to improvement is enjoying playing and learning to the point you're having fun doing it every day. If you can do this, then after years you'll have improved to a level you can't imagine playing at today happy.png

 

Thank you very much for your thoughts,

Hayes

 

 

poodle_noodle

Oh, and a few warnings tongue.png

Lets say you read a whole book and you have all these new ideas you want to try... you may be more knowledgeable, but while you try to work these into your game your rating can temporarily go down. This is normal, don't be discouraged. New ideas make us spend more time, and can distract us from basic blunder checks. After you get used to them your rating will go up.

Also improvement is not steady and continuous. Very often you hear stories of players being stuck at a rating plateau for e.g. a whole year, then suddenly they gain 100 or 200 points in a month.

orthodox70

Poodle-

 

I'm going to print out your answers and make highlights! ;-) Thank you very much for all that insight.

 

Funny, I never thought about looking at square coloration in relation to move possibilities, until you mentioned it, then, "duh!" I'm good at getting forked so I look forward to having a pre-move thought pattern related to color. 

 

I'm glad you've advised me to stay away, generally, from Blitz. I've continually thought, "I'm not ready for this," but I play anyway. I will stick to slow and steady, which is my nature anyway. 

 

I love your idea of printing out games and marking mistakes for consistencies. Great idea, and I will do. I will also buy those books. 

 

I really appreciate your having taken the time to elucidate. Also, great poodle. happy.png

 

Thank you!

Hayes

poodle_noodle

No problem, glad when I can help someone out happy.png

jambyvedar

Regardless of age, books are helpful to anybody. I see no reason that books won't help you. Poodle made good advice. But personally for beginners, I like books that has chapter and breaking down concepts into a theme. Example of themes are power of rooks on open file/7th rank, bad bishop vs strong knights, power of bishop pair, king power in endgame, attacking the king, strong bishop on open file against a knight. Strong players have many pattern knowledge of strategies and tactics. If the theme is breakdown, it will be easier to remember and learn.

 

I suggest you get Winning Chess Strategies by Seirawan and Chess Tactics for Champion by Polgar. The book by Seirawan is a good chess strategies primer that contains knowledge that every beginner should know.  This book contains all the themes i mentioned here and more. The Tactics book by Polgar might contain chess tactics that might be new to you. That tactic book also organized tactics in to themes. Aside from tactics like pin,fork skewer,discovery, destroying king castled position, etc, this book contains puzzles for sibling positions and game saving combinations. This book also briefly annotated famous combinations by great players. When I am teaching my nephew, i am using  these two books for him and it improve his game tremendously.

 

https://www.amazon.com/Winning-Chess-Strategies-Everyman/dp/1857443853

https://www.amazon.com/Chess-Tactics-Champions-step-step/dp/081293671X

 

Here are some tips that can help reduce blunders

1. Look at the whole board to see piece positioning

2. Always study your opponent's last move

3. Before you make a move, check if there is a tactical drawback

4. Solve chess tactics problems everyday

 

For expectations of a beginner, you should not be discourage by setbacks. Sometimes progression can take time. Learn from your mistakes.  When you study strategies using a strategy book, play all the games in a chess board. Don't flip around and study all the contents of the book. You can repeat studying the contents if you want.

 

 

poksham

Never ask online player how to play chess. Go to classes and lessons. Learn from GM or IM.

Candidate35

 An Idiots Guide to Chess by Patrick Wolff would be an excellent starting book. Yasser Seirawan Play Winning Chess series is also excellent. For tactics, and I used this for years even currently,  Bruce Pandolfini has a nice book called 101 Winning End games. Its a $8 book that has excellent themed tactics related to End games and is great for starting out chess players because there are only a few pieces on the board so you have to be accurate and at the same time calculate a bit but its not so overwhelming figuring out what's going on at the board.

 

If you play blitz, do so very infrequently. You need to be building proper thought processes and improving calculation abilities and you just can't do that well in blitz. Instead play a few daily games at a time and 15|10 or greater time control in live chess and use your time to think. Game reviews are very helpful to you as well, find mistakes then a few weeks later set up those positions and decide what a better move would have been. If you see trends in your mistakes you can then work on that specifically.

 

You can improve the most by playing, reviewing games, and practicing tactics. That should be your main chess related activities. Supplement it with other things as time allows, for example endgame book starting with the basic check mates, pawn promotion techniques, king opposition and rook and pawn End games. Silman has a nice Endgame book called The Complete Endgame Course for $20. It has beginner through master level endgame material broken down by rating categories. Quite useful. Cheers on your chess!

LeonSKennedy992

poksham wrote:

Never ask online player how to play chess. Go to classes and lessons. Learn from GM or IM.

agreed. But that being noted....do LOTS of tactics and especially basic endgames :) GOOD LUCK! :)

Neskitzy

Not just anyone at any age can reach master, but everyone is certainly capable of improvement. Study basic endgames and practice winning endgame positions vs an engine. You may lose a lot at first and that's perfectly normal at your level but you will see improvement. That and tactical puzzles appropriate for your level - "Tactics Time!" is a free resource that comes to mind - will bring you plenty of enjoyable improvement for a while to come. Books can be boring and you honestly won't be ready for the usual recommendations from people here for some time. Not saying books are bad, but I do agree to an extent with the post that says not to take advice here, though I'd say take that advice with a grain of salt. The main thing is for you to find a path to improvement that doesn't suck the fun out of chess for you, otherwise... what's the point? Good luck.

Neskitzy

Oh, and a book that you can likely find as a free download somewhere is "Bobby Fischer Teaches Chess." It's a book of puzzles that are for the most part aimed at beginner to early intermediate players. If you can't find it for free, you can get a copy for US$5-6. I still have the copy I got years ago.

SmithyQ

Learning basic tactical patterns is foundational to chess improvement.  That said, especially at first, it's more useful to study one tactical motif in detail before moving onto others.  For instance, study several Knight forks over and over and over before moving onto different forks, and then onto pins or whathaveyou.  Similar to math: it's easier to learn just the 5 times tables instead of trying to memorize the whole table in one go.

This is why Tarrasch's "The Game of Chess" is such a good book.  It first introduces the tactical motif, then expands on it slowly, and soon it shows many complex examples, all of which make sense because you are built up slowly.  The book also deals with basic endgames, which I quite honestly largely ignored.  Still, reading "The Game of Chess" cover to cover, as well as spot-reading various sections, is what got me from beginner to nearly 1800 rating almost by itself.

A second, less well-known suggestion is "Winning in the Opening" by John Walker.  This is the ideal way to study the opening: it deals with opening principles rather than memorizing theory, but even better, he highlights common traps and how to punish incorrect opening moves.  It's a fun book, it's quite cheap, and it's incredibly valuable for a beginner. 

Finally, I would like to add that while studying is great and blitz can give valuable practical experience, there is no substitute for long games.  You need to put the time in to improve, and you get the most bang for your buck in longer time controls.  Don't obsess over this, especially if the Internet is your chief port to other players, but try to find some time for longer games and you'll improve faster as a result.  Good luck. 

kindaspongey

Possibly of interest:
Simple Attacking Plans by Fred Wilson (2012)
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708090402/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review874.pdf
http://dev.jeremysilman.com/shop/pc/Simple-Attacking-Plans-77p3731.htm
Logical Chess: Move by Move by Irving Chernev (1957)
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708104437/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/logichess.pdf
The Most Instructive Games of Chess Ever Played by Irving Chernev (1965)
https://chessbookreviews.wordpress.com/tag/most-instructive-games-of-chess-ever-played/
Winning Chess by Irving Chernev and Fred Reinfeld (1949)
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708093415/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review919.pdf
Back to Basics: Tactics by Dan Heisman (2007)
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708233537/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review585.pdf
Discovering Chess Openings by GM John Emms (2006)
https://web.archive.org/web/20140627114655/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/hansen91.pdf
Openings for Amateurs by Pete Tamburro (2014)
http://kenilworthian.blogspot.com/2014/05/review-of-pete-tamburros-openings-for.html
https://chessbookreviews.wordpress.com/tag/openings-for-amateurs/
https://www.mongoosepress.com/catalog/excerpts/openings_amateurs.pdf
Chess Endgames for Kids by Karsten Müller (2015)
https://chessbookreviews.wordpress.com/tag/chess-endgames-for-kids/
http://www.gambitbooks.com/pdfs/Chess_Endgames_for_Kids.pdf
A Guide to Chess Improvement by Dan Heisman (2010)
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708105628/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review781.pdf
Seirawan stuff:
http://seagaard.dk/review/eng/bo_beginner/ev_winning_chess.asp?KATID=BO&ID=BO-Beginner
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708092617/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review560.pdf
https://www.chess.com/article/view/book-review-winning-chess-endings
https://web.archive.org/web/20140627132508/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/hansen173.pdf
http://www.nystar.com/tamarkin/review1.htm

LeonSKennedy992
Neskitzy wrote:

Oh, and a book that you can likely find as a free download somewhere is "Bobby Fischer Teaches Chess." It's a book of puzzles that are for the most part aimed at beginner to early intermediate players. If you can't find it for free, you can get a copy for US$5-6. I still have the copy I got years ago.

 

OMG, that was the VERY first chess book I ever read.  BRILLIANT book.  Thank you for mentioning it, sir.

Neskitzy

LeonSKennedy992 wrote:

Neskitzy wrote:

Oh, and a book that you can likely find as a free download somewhere is "Bobby Fischer Teaches Chess." It's a book of puzzles that are for the most part aimed at beginner to early intermediate players. If you can't find it for free, you can get a copy for US$5-6. I still have the copy I got years ago.

 

OMG, that was the VERY first chess book I ever read.  BRILLIANT book.  Thank you for mentioning it, sir.

You're welcome, sir. Pops gave me a small collection of books when I started playing, BFTC among several by Reinfeld that I read so much the covers fell off and Laszlo Polgar's "Chess: 5334 Problems" as well as a pretty well annotated book on the '72 Spassky-Fischer WC match by Reshevsky.

orthodox70

[Frustratingly, I can't figure out how to quote others in this comment box, nor how to respond individually, so here are my responses, embedded in one.]

 

Thank you all, very much, for taking the time to answer my question(s). Wow, there's so much great information and encouragement here! I continually marvel at how helpful chess.com players can be. 

 

@poksham A funny answer, indeed. happy.png It may be hard to believe, but I've never actually played a chess game on a board, nor against anyone in person, for that matter. A strange irony, given my age. I will take your advice, though, and try to find a class to attend! Thank you, Poksham!

 

@jambyvedar I plan on buying the books you suggest. Lucky nephew. happy.png Even though your four suggestions (besides the books) are simple, the ones about piece positioning and tactical drawback escape me. Would you mind elucidating? And, would you define 'strategy', or is it generally beyond a beginner's grasp? I often hear comments about opening up lines; is that a strategy? I'm only somewhat more clear on tactics thanks to this website's tactics training.  Thank you, Jamby!

 

@Candidate35 I really appreciate your easy-to-read and understand comments. You're obviously a born teacher! happy.png I will definitely do as you advised re daily play, little to no blitz gaming, analyzing my mistakes during a review process, looking for trends and being calculating. That last word intimidates me: I've never been a calculating person, in my behavior. I like to wing it and see where the proverbial chips fall, but after repeated losses herein for lack of calculation, I'm realizing that I must rise to the occasion and learn to do so! I will buy those books, too, and be more programmed in my learning approach. Thank you, Candidate!

 

@LeonSKennedy992 Tactics and endgames, got it! happy.png I'm an endgame disaster so I think it's time I actually studied various approaches. My favorite experience in chess have usually involved getting a checkmate accidentally. That is not sustainable. Thank you, Leon!

 

@Neskitzy I will find that Fischer book. I gather he was the man. I've played about 100 games against the chess.com computer; that's an 'engine' as you dubbed it, correct? Any advice on how what level (computer adeptness) to choose? I find I can win fairly consistently up until about level 5, and then I get my a** handed to me. Also, should I use the functions that show possible moves, hints and the like? Or, should I go in blind? The advice above is hard to take with a grain of salt, given that each grain counts for so much to this fella right now! And, I'm grateful for yours. happy.png Thank you, Neskitzy!

 

@SmithyQ I really like your suggestion of focusing on a single set of tactics at a time. Your math example is perfect and made me realize that the fact that, from game to game, I often forget tactics that I had previously learned is likely do to having learned several before "perfecting" any one of them. Great point! happy.png I will get those two books and focus on long games. Thank you, Smithy!

 

@kindaspongey Wow, that's an impressive list, and you posted links, too! happy.png Thank you, Spongey! Great name. 

 

I'm going to transfer all of your comments to a chess journal (and build a library) and become more purposeful in my approach to learning and improving. Your input has been very inspiring, especially after a recent string of ludicrous losses, awesome blunders and generally blind dart-throwing! Cheers, and all God's blessing to you and yours! trophies.png

chessrook_80

It might be a tad bit advanced for you but simple attacking plans is one the best books for improvement.

Chess tactics for kids is also good. Good luck!

Eluarelon

Just recently, someone here at chess.com hinted me at  great list of books recommended by none other than prolific chess author and teacher Dan Heisman:

http://www.danheisman.com/recommended-books.html

I like the organization of that list and as Mr. Heismann comments on each book on that list, you already have a hint of what might or might not be useful for you at the moment. Contains some of the recommendations already given here in the thread.

 

Apart from that, I would also recommend two chess book classics, Tarrasch's "Game of Chess" and Nimzowitsch's "My system", as apart from being a joy to read, you'll learn an awesome lot from those two great chess players even when some of the stuff might be a bit advanced at first. In my eyes, two of the best chess books ever written.

EscherehcsE
DeirdreSkye wrote:

Heisman's list of books shows that he doesn't understand much about chess.

     He is a clever guy that has convinced everyone that he is a good coach by saying things others have already said , that's all(the problem is there was no Internet back then and no on line patzers to wroship every simple thing one says).

   In his list of advanced books there is no Kasparov , Tal , Karpov , Bronstein , Keres or Dvorestky.

   So according to Heisman reading de Groot(who?) , Hesse(who?) and Krabbe(who?) is better than reading Kasparov or Karpov.

    Seriously?

 

   

I'm guessing Dan doesn't want to be accused of colluding with Russia. Tongue Out

Ashvapathi

In last 3 years, my ratings rose from 700 to 1700 blitz. So, I would like to give some guidance to lower rated players based on my experience because I was hoping for a similar guidance when I was at that rating. I had to figure out these things on my own. So, I'll help others. I'll give specific advise based on ratings because general advise like 'study, review, play...etc' is really useless. So, I'll try to be specific with my advise. Ratings mentioned below are blitz ratings. Generally, longer time control ratings tend to be atleast 200 points more than blitz rating. Ok, so lets start:

Below 600 rating:

General Exercise - These players have to learn how the pieces move. I would recommend some drills to learn how the pieces move(particularly the knights).

Openings - they randomly push pawns in the opening.

Strategy - play e4 and develop your pieces and castle.

Caveat - But, I would add one caveat that my rating never went below 600, so I don't have first hand knowledge.

600 -1000 rating:

Openings - scholars mate, Damiano's defence. You will see that players at this level randomly push pawns without knowing what they are doing.

General Exercise - Drills for piece movement would still be useful( particularly knights).

Tactical training -  one move checkmate. Basic checkmate patterns using queens. Basic backrank mate.

Endgame - Checkmate with 2 rooks vs king. And also queen +rook vs king. They will be useful for finishing off games where you have clear advantage.

Strategy - at this level your opponents will bring out their queens out very early. You can use that to develop all your pieces with a tempo by attacking his queen. Keep opponent queen under constant attack. Play E4 and Develop your pieces and castle.

 Tips - the most important point at this level is - don't trust your opponent's judgement. Whenever your opponent moves a piece, check if it en prise. Of course, the same applies to your moves.

1000- 1400:

Openings up to 1200 - blackburne shilling gambit, Jerome Gambit, fried liver attack, philidor defence.

Openings up to 1400 - Kings Gambit,  Italian game, giuoco piano, scotch game.

Tactics Training - 2-3 move mates(particularly those involving some sacrifices). Concentrate on escape squares of the king or any trapped piece. Whenever, you are under attack, see if you can counter attack the opponent's king or queen. Basic tactics like pins, fork and discovered attacks.

Strategy - open files for rooks and 7th rank for rook. Simplification when ahead on material. 

Endgame - basic endgame checkmates like king+queen vs king and king+rook vs king. King activity(restricting opponent king activity).

Tips - At this stage, you will have to learn to play with your minor pieces.

1400-1800 rating:  

Openings - asymmetric e4 defences. The most common are French and Sicilian. In sicilian, you see dragon and accelerated dragon from 1300 to 1500. Beyond 1500, you see other sicilians. You will also see Giuoco piano. But Giuoco piano is quite popular from 1200 onwards. As white, players will also use Ruy Lopez and scotch.

Tactics training - basic checkmate patterns like anastassia, greco, anderssen, Arabian, smother,...etc. Advanced back rank mate. Advanced pins,  forks and discovered attacks. Basic zwischenzug I.e. Intermediate move of opponent. Basic removing the guard and overloading( generally queen).

End Game -  Queen+king vs king+soldier. King opposition (king + soldier vs king). Promoting and creating a passed pawn on 3rd or 6th rank. Connected pawns on 3rd/6th rank versus rook(or bishop or horse).

 Strategy - long diagonals for bishop. Using bishop pair(particularly to trap rook).

Tips - learn to use the diagonals effectively.

 

general recommendations:
a) solve tactics. 10-15 per day. Solve them in a reasonable time(2-3 min per puzzle). Solve it in your head before moving the piece. Don't guess.
b) play games.... as many as you can. Play lots of blitz and bullet. Play very few rapid games(1-2  30|0 per week). The main purpose of playing lots of games is to gain experience. But people can fall in losing streaks and lose lots of points in a single day. So, to avoid that when you lose about 25 points(I.e. 3 games in a row), then take a break. Its very difficult to take a break when you are losing( or winning) in a streak. So, I suggest shift the format(like from blitz to bullet).
c) Don't review your games too much or too deeply. Just find the turning point of the game by going over the game once and then move on. Game review time must be around 10% of  game time. There is no point in second guessing every move. 
d) Don't study too much. Only study what is needed( you will find out what to study when you play lot of games). Study for 1-2 hr on weekends. And then try to implement what you studied in your games. Dont study the games of any GMs...etc. Those games are irrelevant to <2000 games. If you want to study the games of masters, then study the games of Morphy(and perhaps Lasker). Don't become a chess book collector. Knowledge that <1800 player needs is available freely all over the net. And it is basic. The real challenge is to implement that in a game.
e) don't resign after blunder(like dropping a piece). Play on for as long as you can(try to get a draw or a stalemate if not a lucky win). By the same token, don't assume the game is won as soon as your opponent blundered a piece. You still have to checkmate him in time(unless opponent resigns).

f) blunder check: Don't trust your opponent's judgement. Whenever your opponent moves a piece, check if he has made a mistake or a blunder. Of course, the same applies to your moves.

g) Time management: time is an important factor in any format. Try to keep up with your opponent on clock. Otherwise, you'll get into time pressure and lose. But, take your time during critical junctures in the game.

h) one general recommendation to all players below 1800 is to avoid d4 and Ruy Lopez. They are very positional and theoretical openings. They are better left for advanced stages.


OK, these are my views. Any constructive criticism or feedback is welcome. Hope you will benefit from advise and succeed in getting better at chess. All the best.