Check out Chuck Klosterman's distinction between an archenemy and a nemesis (in the column on the right).
Big Enemies
Sort:
Apr 22, 2011
0
#23
rigamagician wrote: Check out Chuck Klosterman's distinction between an archenemy and a nemesis (in the column on the right).
Chuck Klosterman is not my friend (hence I can't follow your link) so I suppose he must be my enemy.
Apr 22, 2011
0
#24
artfizz wrote:
rigamagician wrote: Check out Chuck Klosterman's distinction between an archenemy and a nemesis (in the column on the right).
Chuck Klosterman is not my friend (hence I can't follow your link) so I suppose he must be my enemy.
Here's his original article from Esquire on "The Importance of being Hated."
Evil_Homer wrote:
seed wrote:
it looks that you dont understand.better stay out of this.i want to know when they are onlineEvil_Homer wrote:
seed wrote:
Evil_Homer wrote:
You can block players if you wish to do so.
It is something totally different.I do not want to block but not to forget .
Then write it in a notepad.
No, I understand perfectly.
Please refer to the numerous other forum topics which talk about the sometimes seemingly excessive demands of non paying members.
It would seem that lots of free stuff is never enough for some people. :-(
And it seems a lot of people who pay for something are self-righteous. Your pedestal isn't very high.
I've previously alluded to it privately with a more specific purpose in mind, but I think the ability to tag discussion topics across the board (many tags to many topics) would help the search and cross-reference capabilities immensely.
KEYWORDS: tags tagging searchable keywords attributes
I couldn't agree more. And not just for whole forum topics, but also ...
A consequence of such a powerful facility being available would be that many of the existing organising schemes would become redundant, as they would just be special cases of a generic, integrated scheme. e.g. forum categories, groups, friends, countries.