40.3% of your games on this site have been in those formats. I would say that you have a very healthy distribution of formats.
Blitz and Bullet Hurtful?
If you want to get better at blitz, then play blitz. If you want to get better at longer games, play longer games.

I think that's nonesense. Playing blitz is a great way of quickly gaining experience of positions/situations that can applied to longer formats whether you found the right solution in the blitz game or not.

In my opinion whether you do well or not in Blitz games, at least you should make sure you don't end up being totally bad moves and blunders. If you feel that you actually make moves that look more or less reasonable then, even if you lose, you still playing a "normal game".
Now with 1 minute bullet chess I think most people do not benefit from it at all. I believe it should never be less than 3 minutes per side. One minute is just too mindless IMO. Especially if you play that over a table it's ridiculous.

Just make sure you aren't moving too quickly in your regular games. I think the biggest threat of blitz and bullet is just moving too quickly when you don't have to.

I think that's nonesense. Playing blitz is a great way of quickly gaining experience of positions/situations that can applied to longer formats whether you found the right solution in the blitz game or not.

I thought we were friends

http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1013454
The man on the right was apparently good at speed chess.
Are blitz and bullet chess games hurting my chess ability? I would love to get better at chess and I was wondering if I should drop these two styles of play? What do you reccomend instead?
Thanks!
~Happy