Bobby fischer is still the best chess player in the world!
Sort:
just accept the fact guys
Whatever.
No! Hikaru Nakamura is better!
macer75 wrote:
No! Hikaru Nakamura is better!
It can't be true. According to the chess personality quiz Naka is the exact opposite in style to myself, so therefore he can't be the best. Simple.
Bobby is no longer "in" the world.
ChessOath wrote:
There is a video where he takes that quiz and gets a different personality.
macer75 wrote:
No! Hikaru Nakamura is better!
It can't be true. According to the chess personality quiz Naka is the exact opposite in style to myself, so therefore he can't be the best. Simple.
Burke wrote:
but still all current top chess players are not able to kill his superiority over the games
Bobby is no longer "in" the world.
Kasparov, top master.
Jul 19, 2016
0
#12
Just accept he's dead and move on, man.
rsvan wrote:
just accept the fact guys
ltristam wrote:
that's the point! thank you itristam
He's dead but still alive in the world of chess.....
macer75 wrote:
haha so you've just supported my statement cause the better is < the best
No! Hikaru Nakamura is better!
imsighked2 wrote:
believe it or not there is an afterlife no matter if you're an atheist
Perhaps -- in the afterlife -- if there is an afterlife.
"believe it or not there is an afterlife no matter if you're an atheist"
Prove it. Go there, then send us a message from the other side! 
ltristam wrote:
Magnus has broken Fischers rating obviously
Ratings are somewhat like currency, meaning that absolute numbers representing a certain value have a steady tendency to get inflated over time.
That put aside, did anyone after Fischer dominate the chess world as much as he did in the late 1960s/early 1970s (most iconic example of said domination being the Candidates Tournament in 1971 where he obliterated both Taimanov and Larsen 6:0)?
Kasparov's early world championship matches against Karpov dragged on endlessly, and even after claiming the title from he always had Karpov close behind him. As for Carlsen, I don't think he exerts a dominance as strong as Fischer once did either.
Bawker wrote:
if God permits me to do that so there will be no more test,it's a test from god to believe in Him or not,cause we hadn't been exist before we were born,that's the proof that God exists
"believe it or not there is an afterlife no matter if you're an atheist"
Prove it. Go there, then send us a message from the other side!
jaaas wrote:
your argument is correct sir
ltristam wrote:
Magnus has broken Fischers rating obviously
Ratings are somewhat like currency, meaning that absolute numbers representing a certain value have a steady tendency to get inflated over time.
That put aside, did anyone after Fischer dominate the chess world as much as he did in the late 1960s/early 1970s (most iconic example of said domination being the Candidates Tournament in 1971 where he obliterated both Taimanov and Larsen 6:0)?
Kasparov's early world championship matches against Karpov dragged on endlessly, and even after claiming the title from he always had Karpov close behind him. As for Carlsen, I don't think he exerts a dominance as strong as Fischer once did either.