After the disaster with the FIDE and Karpov it seems that Fischer became a modern version of " The Flying Dutchman ", roaming all over this planet with no purpose at all. It is a shame that he did not buckle-down and start writing books ( such as: Fischer On Morphy or Fischer On Tal or Fischer on Karpov or Fischer on Kasparov etc etc ). Perhaps working together with someone like GM Larry Evans would have led to some success in that field. Also it is possible that doing well with writing might have spared us a lot of the later unpleasantness regarding Fischer as well.
Indeed, so much wasted potential. Although he never appeared to be what you'd call a "natural" writer, he could have just repeated his collaborative work pattern with Larry Evans (M60MG) for a book on the 1972 match right after it happened and made a ton of money through sheer name recognition. Unfortunately, in 1972 he was already displaying the "Nobody is going to make a nickel off of me!" attitude that pretty much kills most business negotiations.
In the HBO documentary there's a segment from 1972 where Fischer's interviewed by a reporter just having won the world championship. Asked about his plans, he says he wants to play more chess, that he doesn't feel like he's played enough chess. What happened to that plan?
The documentary also has a Karpov (retrospective) assessment that the 1975 forfeiture was at least in part due to Fischer's fear of losing, that once you're reached to top of your field there's nowhere to go but down. Back in the 1970s I would have dismissed that claim as too flattering to Karpov's ego, but in retrospect I think there's a lot of truth to it. In Fischer's rise to the championship he just humiliated his opponents in the candidate's matches -- how do you top a performance like that?
谢谢