Bullet?
Sort:
It's just when I compare my 1200 bullet games to your 2000 bullet games I see no difference. 1200s got even more book moves on average than you, same proportion of best and excellent moves, great move/inaccuracy/mistake/blunder on occasion. And yet somehow we are 800 rating away from each other. What I also find interesting is that whenever I get matched against 1400-1500 bullet players they just abort the game in 99 % of cases instantly. Somehow we both know that the chances of me winning is actually way too high and they are not willing to take the risk.
Nov 20, 2024
0
#4
I did some research. In your last 10 bullet games, your average was 67,84. In my last 10 bullet games it was 82,36. I would say it is quite a significant difference.
Nov 20, 2024
0
#5
If i send you friend request by accident, ignore it. It was misclick. I only add to friens people who are my friend in real life. Sorry
I played around 100x 1 minute bullet games today, questionably the last 20 shouldn't have happened at all, because I was exhausted, but power of addiction kept me going. Not the optimal way to do an analysis
Nov 20, 2024
0
#8
There’s a lot of qualities that go into bullet that go beyond anything you can put into stats, sometimes you have to know when to play a subpar move for the sake of setting the opponent practical problems, you have to know when to go into flagging mode, when to use premoves (and when not to), when to try dirty moves and so on.
One thing is for sure, if one player is regularly 1200 and another is regularly 2000, then that’s not a coincidence…
How does an average 1200 bullet player plays nearly perfect flawless game same as 1800+ rapid and all that within a minute too. I don't get it.... How are these people so good