bullet vs blitz and playing long games
Sort:
On here u played 45 minute games? I just figured ten minutes was long enough but not to long and it would still give me the time to move with a little rush in decision making if u know what I mean. And by all means I know I'm not great. I just wanted to make it challenging enough but with a little time for the decision-making is well not to contradict myself
I mean yes I was talking to you before but I'm open to opinions on what a good time limit is. And I still don't get that 2/1 or 2/3 or 3/1 etc.
May 23, 2016
0
#24
Dear <BlurredLife>
I refer you again to my comment #3 on the previous page - in it you will find everything about what I think is a good and meaningful time limit for any player of your level, +/- several hundred points.
My comment #11 explains what "blitz" and "bullet" mean on chess.com
Of course, you're a free person and you can play any time control you want.
Cheers!
solskytz wrote:
lol. Weren't you the guy who said you like to avoid fights on the first page? In my opinion you are asking for it.
Dear <BlurredLife>
I refer you again to my comment #3 on the previous page - in it you will find everything about what I think is a good and meaningful time limit for you.
My comment #11 explains what "blitz" and "bullet" mean on chess.com
Of course, you're a free person and you can play any time control you want.
Cheers!
You are talking to me?
Well, I was writing my opinion and you can have a different opinion. I'm not going to argue.
When I was around your level I didn't know about chess clocks - and a friendly game with people of similar levels typically lasted at least 45 minutes or an hour. Sometimes longer.
Then I did learn about chess clocks - but still didn't feel too fondly about fast time controls - until I improved my play and raised my rating past 1500 IRL.