That worked really well for Fischer !
Fischer never lost his title. FIDE didn't own the title, Fischer did. So FIDE was unable to give the title to Karpov, regardless of what FIDE/popular opinion says.
Do you have some arguments, or its just a fan's view of the what actually happened?
So far we have heard comments from GMs Gelfand, Kramnik, and Aronian...none in agreement with Carlsen's point of view. I wonder what is Anand's perspective, and which GMs make up the group that Carlsen refers to in his letter?