Carlsen only wishes.........

Sort:
letsgohome
TBentley wrote:

It's hard to get information about how somebody played when they were eight years old (it appears he learned how to play when he was five, but didn't really get involved until he was eight). He did finish 6.5/11 in the youngest division of the Norwegian Chess Championship though. (I'm hoping the OP doesn't actually believe what he's saying.)

Exactly , so what I am saying is the truth, becuase I am comparing us to our first year we were introduced. Thus, I am rated higher than he could even imagine, since he was disinterested in chess when he was first introduced.

TBentley

Well done, you're better at chess than a five-year-old was. Quite an achievement.

letsgohome
TBentley wrote:

Well done, you're better at chess than a five-year-old was. Quite an achievement.

Thank you brah. FINALLLY some positive feedback from the community. I really appreciate that you grasp the significiance in this accomplishment.

helltank

Carlsen only wishes....

... that Chess.com has a test to filter out idiots....

letsgohome
helltank wrote:

Carlsen only wishes....

... that Chess.com has a test to filter out idiots....

well, im in the top 91 percentile brah on live standard, so I would past brah. Get your ratings up brah with hard work you can accomplish anything.  I truly believe in your abilities. And in this world of withheld permissions may you fly higher my future chess rating brah.

KvothDuval
letsgohome wrote:
helltank wrote:

Carlsen only wishes....

... that Chess.com has a test to filter out idiots....

well, im in the top 91 percentile brah on live standard, so I would past brah. Get your ratings up brah with hard work you can accomplish anything.  I truly believe in your abilities. And in this world of withheld permissions may you fly higher my future chess rating brah.

 

 

+1 brah... you are my hero and inspiration!!

letsgohome
I-eat-guini-pigs wrote:
letsgohome wrote:
helltank wrote:

Carlsen only wishes....

... that Chess.com has a test to filter out idiots....

well, im in the top 91 percentile brah on live standard, so I would past brah. Get your ratings up brah with hard work you can accomplish anything.  I truly believe in your abilities. And in this world of withheld permissions may you fly higher my future chess rating brah.

 

 

+1 brah... you are my hero and inspiration!!

no one should be your hero. For you should be your own hero brah. That is all

KvothDuval
letsgohome wrote:
I-eat-guini-pigs wrote:
letsgohome wrote:
helltank wrote:

Carlsen only wishes....

... that Chess.com has a test to filter out idiots....

well, im in the top 91 percentile brah on live standard, so I would past brah. Get your ratings up brah with hard work you can accomplish anything.  I truly believe in your abilities. And in this world of withheld permissions may you fly higher my future chess rating brah.

 

 

+1 brah... you are my hero and inspiration!!

no one should be your hero. For you should be your own hero brah. That is all

who says I cant have 2?

letsgohome

Because two will detract your ability to complete self-transcendence brah. That is why.

helltank
letsgohome wrote:
helltank wrote:

Carlsen only wishes....

... that Chess.com has a test to filter out idiots....

well, im in the top 91 percentile brah on live standard, so I would past brah. Get your ratings up brah with hard work you can accomplish anything.  I truly believe in your abilities. And in this world of withheld permissions may you fly higher my future chess rating brah.

That may well be true, except for the fact that you're too stupid to get into the top 91 percentile. Therefore, you must be lying.

letsgohome
helltank wrote:
letsgohome wrote:
helltank wrote:

Carlsen only wishes....

... that Chess.com has a test to filter out idiots....

well, im in the top 91 percentile brah on live standard, so I would past brah. Get your ratings up brah with hard work you can accomplish anything.  I truly believe in your abilities. And in this world of withheld permissions may you fly higher my future chess rating brah.

That may well be true, except for the fact that you're too stupid to get into the top 91 percentile. Therefore, you must be lying.

lmao. buy a membership and go to my stats brah. LOL, yes I am lying and no one brought it up but you. LOL. So you are saying that you are smarter than the over 1000 people that have seen this thread. LOL

BMeck

Your average opponents rating is 1211.... your rating is inflated.

letsgohome

lmao go look in my  recent game archive. Obviously my average opponent rating is when I was just beginning and losing brah. My search is -50 and +200. I rarely play players worst than me, because with my non studying chess regimen I can only learn by playing plers better than me.

macer75

Wait a sec... ur average opponent rating is 1211, your record is (717 W/ 705 L / 28 D), which is pretty much winning half and losing half, yet your rating is 1445. How is that possible?

letsgohome
macer75 wrote:

Wait a sec... ur average opponent rating is 1211, your record is (717 W/ 705 L / 28 D), which is pretty much winning half and losing half, yet your rating is 1445. How is that possible?

LMAO. Good point, so i must be playing higher rated players than me and winning at a rate that my rating climbs right.  Or  does what that guy that says I am inflating my rating make more sense lol. Thank you macer75

letsgohome

I wrote the thread to try and see if I can play with players rated  higher than me. I  am sorry if I offended anybody with this thread for that was not my intention. However, for those of the chess poopulation that have a sense of humour, which I think is 100%, with a margin of error+-1, I think this thread has some things that may put a smile on your face if you get my complex sense of humour. Anyways, I enjoyed my debates with those who accepted, but still no one can disprove my opening thread, based on a mathematical standpoint. 

BMeck

You realize people could check your average opponents rating right.... It clearly says 1211. Your rating is inflated, hate to break it to you.

letsgohome
BMeck wrote:

You realize people could check your average opponents rating right.... It clearly says 1211. Your rating is inflated, hate to break it to you.

lmao ok keep believing that brah. Whatever makes you sleep better at night brah

BMeck

Clear as day, your kind of stupid does not come around often. I like you

letsgohome
BMeck wrote:

Clear as day, your kind of stupid does not come around often. I like you

you are the one that looks real stupid based on the last 7 posts or so. Go look at my recent games archive and see if I am playing weaker players lol.