Well done, you're better at chess than a five-year-old was. Quite an achievement.
Carlsen only wishes.........
Well done, you're better at chess than a five-year-old was. Quite an achievement.
Thank you brah. FINALLLY some positive feedback from the community. I really appreciate that you grasp the significiance in this accomplishment.
Carlsen only wishes....
... that Chess.com has a test to filter out idiots....
well, im in the top 91 percentile brah on live standard, so I would past brah. Get your ratings up brah with hard work you can accomplish anything. I truly believe in your abilities. And in this world of withheld permissions may you fly higher my future chess rating brah.

Carlsen only wishes....
... that Chess.com has a test to filter out idiots....
well, im in the top 91 percentile brah on live standard, so I would past brah. Get your ratings up brah with hard work you can accomplish anything. I truly believe in your abilities. And in this world of withheld permissions may you fly higher my future chess rating brah.
+1 brah... you are my hero and inspiration!!
Carlsen only wishes....
... that Chess.com has a test to filter out idiots....
well, im in the top 91 percentile brah on live standard, so I would past brah. Get your ratings up brah with hard work you can accomplish anything. I truly believe in your abilities. And in this world of withheld permissions may you fly higher my future chess rating brah.
+1 brah... you are my hero and inspiration!!
no one should be your hero. For you should be your own hero brah. That is all

Carlsen only wishes....
... that Chess.com has a test to filter out idiots....
well, im in the top 91 percentile brah on live standard, so I would past brah. Get your ratings up brah with hard work you can accomplish anything. I truly believe in your abilities. And in this world of withheld permissions may you fly higher my future chess rating brah.
+1 brah... you are my hero and inspiration!!
no one should be your hero. For you should be your own hero brah. That is all
who says I cant have 2?

Carlsen only wishes....
... that Chess.com has a test to filter out idiots....
well, im in the top 91 percentile brah on live standard, so I would past brah. Get your ratings up brah with hard work you can accomplish anything. I truly believe in your abilities. And in this world of withheld permissions may you fly higher my future chess rating brah.
That may well be true, except for the fact that you're too stupid to get into the top 91 percentile. Therefore, you must be lying.
Carlsen only wishes....
... that Chess.com has a test to filter out idiots....
well, im in the top 91 percentile brah on live standard, so I would past brah. Get your ratings up brah with hard work you can accomplish anything. I truly believe in your abilities. And in this world of withheld permissions may you fly higher my future chess rating brah.
That may well be true, except for the fact that you're too stupid to get into the top 91 percentile. Therefore, you must be lying.
lmao. buy a membership and go to my stats brah. LOL, yes I am lying and no one brought it up but you. LOL. So you are saying that you are smarter than the over 1000 people that have seen this thread. LOL
lmao go look in my recent game archive. Obviously my average opponent rating is when I was just beginning and losing brah. My search is -50 and +200. I rarely play players worst than me, because with my non studying chess regimen I can only learn by playing plers better than me.

Wait a sec... ur average opponent rating is 1211, your record is (717 W/ 705 L / 28 D), which is pretty much winning half and losing half, yet your rating is 1445. How is that possible?
Wait a sec... ur average opponent rating is 1211, your record is (717 W/ 705 L / 28 D), which is pretty much winning half and losing half, yet your rating is 1445. How is that possible?
LMAO. Good point, so i must be playing higher rated players than me and winning at a rate that my rating climbs right. Or does what that guy that says I am inflating my rating make more sense lol. Thank you macer75
I wrote the thread to try and see if I can play with players rated higher than me. I am sorry if I offended anybody with this thread for that was not my intention. However, for those of the chess poopulation that have a sense of humour, which I think is 100%, with a margin of error+-1, I think this thread has some things that may put a smile on your face if you get my complex sense of humour. Anyways, I enjoyed my debates with those who accepted, but still no one can disprove my opening thread, based on a mathematical standpoint.

You realize people could check your average opponents rating right.... It clearly says 1211. Your rating is inflated, hate to break it to you.
It's hard to get information about how somebody played when they were eight years old (it appears he learned how to play when he was five, but didn't really get involved until he was eight). He did finish 6.5/11 in the youngest division of the Norwegian Chess Championship though. (I'm hoping the OP doesn't actually believe what he's saying.)
Exactly , so what I am saying is the truth, becuase I am comparing us to our first year we were introduced. Thus, I am rated higher than he could even imagine, since he was disinterested in chess when he was first introduced.