Is a single networking incident considered spamming?
Carlson or Caruana?
Is a single networking incident considered spamming?
Huh? Did you see the most recent posts on side? It's the same exact post on like 10 different threads
Is a single networking incident considered spamming?
Huh? Did you see the most recent posts on side? It's the same exact post on like 10 different threads
I did notice that after the fact. Not as bad as posting 100 times in one thread, i guess
no bar? no gambling (take a chance?) Roll the dice!
my choice is (even steven) harper?mulroney?trudeau?Justin Case(green&yellow)tractor!
so i'm not first(thirst) @ least(lease) i'm playing com-pet-ative CHESs
it breaks my heart to know some-one has to louse the house over to DRUGS!
what happy day's are coming to Chess for FUN!
After the first two games, its looking more and more like Fabi's championship. Carlsen has either looked toothless as in the 2nd game, or completely messed up a winning position like in the first game. Neither of two are traits of chess champions.
After the first two games, its looking more and more like Fabi's championship. Carlsen has either looked toothless as in the 2nd game, or completely messed up a winning position like in the first game. Neither of two are traits of chess champions.
So what would be the point of for example 24 or 32 games match or "fischer type" with draws excluded? is it better to see 9-10 worthless games than 29 worhtless games?
these two are just waiting for rapid, so is it better to take them one day only to play few blitz games, take EUROs and vanish?
recently done European Championship (swiss type) or IoM Open for example gave much more interesting and fighting moments. Shall we go back to Las Vegas '99 formula?
Carlsen obviously. Do you even need to ask that question?
Ties don't mean anything. Caruana was playing from supercomputer memorised lines and he still could't rattle carlsen who can play any opening. If it is level carlsen will crush caruana in tie brake format.
Carlsen obviously. Do you even need to ask that question?
Ties don't mean anything. Caruana was playing from supercomputer memorised lines and he still could't rattle carlsen who can play any opening. If it is level carlsen will crush caruana in tie brake format.
Unfortunately for your scenario, today Caruana managed to outplay Carlsen from a completely even position far from the opening where machine prep helps.
I still think Carlsen is the most likely winner, but Fabiano definitely showed he can play at this level today.
Carlsen obviously. Do you even need to ask that question?
Ties don't mean anything. Caruana was playing from supercomputer memorised lines and he still could't rattle carlsen who can play any opening. If it is level carlsen will crush caruana in tie brake format.
Not very familiar with Norway's super computer dedicated to chess then I take it.
a FM spamming forums... lol