Stop complaining. I use cc to vacuum my room
Why you complain?
Had to change the dust bag and free time presented itself. TICCPROW
Acronymization can be a particularly effective cipher.
Had to change the dust bag and free time presented itself. TICCPROW
Acronymization can be a particularly effective cipher.
Provided one do bother looking it up... I didn't. I only assume it's supposed to be funny.
What if someone posts in between?
Then you see it immediatly, and then your remark becomes suddendly legit.
What do I see immediatly? Bad spelling?
Of course it shows under what spirit of soulless profit that company among so many others, is run.
So many people want to characterise Chess.com this way, especially folks who like the open source model that lichess runs. It's not true, though - it's never just been about profit, as is pretty obvious from any of the numerous interview @erik has conducted...
In other words, if I hear an interview of Elon Musk swearing he never tried to get rich, I should believe him?
No.
In the latest interview I saw, @erik even talks about how the have to de-corporatise new employees when they start with Chess.com, because it's not about suits.
So you agree. No.
About not believing Elon Musk? Yes, I agree he's a liar and a bad person.
I don't agree that Erik is lying in those interviews.
Of course it shows under what spirit of soulless profit that company among so many others, is run.
So many people want to characterise Chess.com this way, especially folks who like the open source model that lichess runs. It's not true, though - it's never just been about profit, as is pretty obvious from any of the numerous interview @erik has conducted...
In other words, if I hear an interview of Elon Musk swearing he never tried to get rich, I should believe him?
No.
In the latest interview I saw, @erik even talks about how the have to de-corporatise new employees when they start with Chess.com, because it's not about suits.
So you agree. No.
About not believing Elon Musk? Yes, I agree he's a liar and a bad person.
I don't agree that Erik is lying in those interviews.
Who is Erik? Why should I trust him?
Hes in charge of some of chess.com stuff
Hes in charge of some of chews.com stuff
Is that anything like chewy.com? That's where we get our cat food.
Of course it shows under what spirit of soulless profit that company among so many others, is run.
So many people want to characterise Chess.com this way, especially folks who like the open source model that lichess runs. It's not true, though - it's never just been about profit, as is pretty obvious from any of the numerous interview @erik has conducted...
In other words, if I hear an interview of Elon Musk swearing he never tried to get rich, I should believe him?
No.
In the latest interview I saw, @erik even talks about how the have to de-corporatise new employees when they start with Chess.com, because it's not about suits.
So you agree. No.
About not believing Elon Musk? Yes, I agree he's a liar and a bad person.
I don't agree that Erik is lying in those interviews.
Who is Erik? Why should I trust him?
@erik Chess.com founder and CEO. Check out some of his interviews and decide for yourself whether you want to trust him rather than pre-emptively deciding he is untrustworthy.
He's right though.
Who is right? The quote function is your friend.
Common sense aswell. Default is he'd be replying to the post directly above his, where you'll find who's he talking about.
Or you could just quote the post you're responding to. It's only one mouse click. That is why the function exists. Hiding behind 'common sense' seems kind of lazy.
Unlike not trying to figure out by looking up the post above?
What if someone posts in between? It's one mouse click, and no confusion. If you are too lazy to click one button, I reserve the right to be lazy in researching what you are talking about.
I couldn't mouse click, I was on my phone.
Btw W pfp.
17 ??? there's people that do this on the forums every time, nothing different about it, nothing unusual.
damn this got pretty popular
What do I see immediatly? Bad spelling?
No, an excusable typo at worst, such as induced by swiftly and promptly. It's your language man, not mine. Take responsibility for the incoherences of it. Nothing such with the French immédiatement. Ah.
Ahhh so typos aren't bad spekling new
#inb4thelock
A typo is when you inadvertently miss or mistype a letter (like when you hit the key next to the one you meant to hit, or hit it not hard enough).
When yes it does produce "bad English", it is not the same thing than when one types a word incorrectly for believing it must be typed so.
.... Are we still on v3 or has it moved on to v4 somewhere along the way?
..
Part of v3 was the ability to incrementally update code without a wholesale site upgrade. Multiple parts have had upgrades since then but I don't think there's an naming of v4 or anything like that.
Yeah, it's annoying. At least they don't do what lichess does where they just freeze the entire game when the lag enters. I think that if lag enters, the game should be immediately aborted.
And then we would get lots of people complaining about aborted games even though they've got high speed internet that works fine (apparently) with everything else...
Do verbal batteries drool when overused?