Read the new article on Fair Play Policy in Chess.com news. I think it might interest you.
Cheating?


surprise to me? Is Cheating possible here? how do they cheat? I dont understand... thankfully never come across such persons...

A ha! I didn't realize enough people were idiots to think someone playing well after getting mad at loosing was cheating. No more wasting time on ticked off idiots on the forums. Thanks buddy.

surprise to me? Is Cheating possible here? how do they cheat? I dont understand... thankfully never come across such persons...
You use the analysis board on the game

Use the analysis feature, if they have a ridiculous best move percentage they could be cheating
(do this after the game has ended or else you are cheating yourself)

No cheating accusations are allowed on the forums. Go to the "Cheating Forum" club to talk about cheating and report cheating accusations. This thread will be locked by someone other that me.

Also, by the way...
"If you can't admit defeat, you aren't qualified to play."
-Horrible Tomato
Actually, the original is
"If you can't find the board, you aren't qualified to play."
BUT IT'S STILL MY QUOTE.

Hi, I do not think the opponent in the game (black) is cheating. I think 12...Bg5 loses a piece after 13.f4 Nxd3 14.Qc2, and also black missed a hanging center pawn with 12...Nxd3.
So I think the level is too low for any cheating, and white does not see his chances to win..
I think it is very dangerous for most players to accuse others of cheating, because they are not good enough to see how they can get an advantage, and so they think their opponent plays perfectly. When really, they are both making a lot of mistakes.
I was accused of cheating a lot, and it was very unpleasant.

"If you have a low rating and you cheat you really massacre someone else’s rating. So don’t expect them to lie down and take it. I called them on it and I blocked them. No interest in playing cheaters."
No, what happened was you ignored their diagonal attack and let them rook lift over to the kingside. When you chose not to trade queens by playing Qe6 (typical of 1300 and under players) you allowed black to have too many pieces aimed at your king.
This is the game I am talking about. It is mentioned in the comment. Sorry, I do not know how to put games here.

Chess is a hard game especially against guys who have 10,000 moves memorized. For stupid people like me it's almost impossible to get better. For the people who have an eidetic memory it's almost impossible to beat them. What are dumb people like me supposed to do? Cheating is the only recourse.

Nobody is going to give someone money or food off craigslist. At the least it's doubtful. Also chess is impossible for stupid people like me. For the record I've never cheated, but I understand why people do it. Chess is stupid

To play in the Chess.com stage band I have to cheat. All the real musicians get legitimate sheet music. Staff gives me a Worshak Ink Blot chart and say....."Its in 2".
So, I just played someone who had one good game against me; then I easily beat that person three times in a row. The large difference in ratings made sense. All of a sudden that person started pulling out moves that were far beyond that person’s level. It made no sense in relation to the games I had just won against that person.. Cheating? I’m sick of it; If you have a low rating and you cheat you really massacre someone else’s rating. So don’t expect them to lie down and take it. I called them on it and I blocked them. No interest in playing cheaters.