Cheating
Sort:
Nope, report him and hopefully someone will look into your claim
Just looked at the persons profile, they dont look like a cheater to me.
bYeStand wrote:
Just looked at the persons profile, they dont look like a cheater to me.
I mean he beat a 1600 with top accuracy which sounds kinda sus, but anyway thanks
Sep 2, 2021
0
#6
Hunnie, he played the Evan's Gambit....How many players that are at my level could play that opening as well as he did?
I was once told that a Gambit is good for blitz and bullet - a very sharp mind I'd say.
I'm with bYeStand on this one.
December_TwentyNine wrote:
Hunnie, he played the Evan's Gambit....How many players that are at my level could play that opening as well as he did?
I was once told that a Gambit is good for blitz and bullet - a very sharp mind I'd say.
I'm with bYeStand on this one.
I mean I played as white but ok, you also may wanna check his recent games
rich wrote:
It actually say's 99.6 accuracy that's if I'm looking at the correct game, that is.
yea it's 99.6, sorry for miswriting but yea the moves are all top engine's suggestion
yea take a look at his profile, the image above
Sep 2, 2021
0
#11
He lost 19 games and drew 2 since August 25th.
I just don't think he's cheating. Because, wouldn't a cheater want to win every single game?
It happens, maybe he's just on a hot winning streak, I've gotten 10 correct in a row in the tactical trainer (only to then miss then next 4 straight after that.)
I know chess.com has staff members that are PAID to investigate these types of claims. What are those people called. Fair Play Analyzer? I forgot....
....but anyway.
December_TwentyNine wrote:
He lost 19 games and drew 2 since August 25th.
I just don't think he's cheating. Because, wouldn't a cheater want to win every single game?
It happens, maybe he's just on a hot winning streak, I've gotten 10 correct in a row in the tactical trainer (only to then miss then next 4 straight after that.)
I know chess.com has staff members that are PAID to investigate these types of claims. What are those people called. Fair Play Analyzer? I forgot....
....but anyway.
thanks though, have a great day
public accusations are not allowed in the forum
Sep 2, 2021
0
#14
Take a look at his losses - he lost to a player that played 1. g3 1-0. On move 17 (on this one game I'm thinking of) he could have taken that Pawn with the Queen to win the Knight. His opponent couldn't have used the Queen to defend it because then he's just take the Queen.....but then again, he won a Rook 3 moves later.
Then on move 35 he had to give up his Queen to save the King.
What an interesting game to look at.
Consider this OP. He's one of those "I'm not resigning an endgame where it's a Q vs. B plus I'm down 2 Pawns. Come and get me!!!" players.
Sep 2, 2021
0
#15
bYeStand wrote:
Just looked at the persons profile, they dont look like a cheater to me.
what do you mean? he has averaged about 99.3 over his last ten games. you dont think that is suspicious?
Sep 2, 2021
0
#16
I think it's worth it to submit a claim to the chess.com staff to have them investigate it.
But I think he just got lucky!!!
OP, keep us updated!!!
Sep 3, 2021
0
#17
Hi,
Anyone your suspicious off please report
https://support.chess.com/article/209-how-do-i-report-someone
Cheating discussion isn't for the general forums please join the cheating forum
https://www.chess.com/club/cheating-forum
Today I played against a 1200 or so in a rapid game. He was beating me up the whole game so I kinda got suspicious of him. I checked the game's analysis ( he got 99.8 accuracy ) and his profile and I mean he is pretty much a cheater I think. However he's a long-time gold-member so would he get away with this?