cause i lose on time / by blunders in time trouble. eg.
chess and IQ
Sort:
Satranç oyununu zeka oyunu olarak görüyor ve bunu IQ ya bağlıyoruz. aslında biraz düşünürsek bu şans işine de benziyor.. ruh haline göre değişim gösterebilir sonuçlar, ne kadar zeki olursanız olun en son ki ruh haliniz belirler satranç oyununun sonucunu.
Apr 6, 2020
0
#45
Asparagusic_acids wrote:
That means you have a weak intuition.
blundering a rook with 10 seconds left is having weak intuition? oki
Apr 6, 2020
0
#46
1_a31-0 wrote:
Asparagusic_acids wrote:
That means you have a weak intuition.
blundering a rook with 10 seconds left is having weak intuition? oki
Tactical Intuition
Apr 6, 2020
0
#48
1_a31-0 wrote:
Not rlly. It’s just hanging a piece in time trouble
that means you have bad tactics
Apr 6, 2020
0
#51
Asparagusic_acids wrote:
1_a31-0 wrote:
Not rlly. It’s just hanging a piece in time trouble
that means you have bad tactics
Top notch professors of computer science discussing here.
Apr 6, 2020
0
#52
Asparagusic_acids wrote:
my tactics is 500 rating points above yours
Cause I don’t do tactics on chess.com, I use chesstempo...?
Apr 6, 2020
0
#53
WeylTransform wrote:
Asparagusic_acids wrote:
1_a31-0 wrote:
Not rlly. It’s just hanging a piece in time trouble
that means you have bad tactics
Top notch professors of computer science discussing here.
are you differentialgalois?
Apr 6, 2020
0
#55
WeylTransform wrote:
How did you know?!
You both love math, you both have similar ratings, both from Australia, and finally similar profile.
Apr 6, 2020
0
#56
Asparagusic_acids wrote:
WeylTransform wrote:
How did you know?!
You both love math, you both have similar ratings, both from Australia, and finally similar profile.
Well, I don't mind theoretical physics, or even CS for that matter? Oh, and enmesh into that equation the glorious notion of hijacking a thread.
Apr 6, 2020
0
#58
Amitkathe25 wrote:
hi, I am struggling between 1450-1600 from last 3 years . no matter hard I try I unable to defeat any 1700+ player , this brings me a theory that it is possible that my IQ is capable only to achieve around 1600 and I can't defeat any 1700+ players since their IQ Must be better than me .. I see it's all LUCK..lucky those 1700+ players who naturally got bigger sharper brain ...it's not Talent but Luck ...thank you
It's useful to have a little perspective on all of this. What does excellence at chess mean ? For a very few folk a reasonable pay day. For the rest of us we enjoy it and try and "overtake the runner in front of us".
I think the idea that chess is science and art is a load of baloney. Do we as chess players appreciate the greats ? Yes sure, but I believe that someone who invented the paperclip or raised healthy responsible children is superior to Fischer, Kasparov, Carlsen et al
Apr 6, 2020
0
#59
Sums it up in a nutshell - this thinking someone is superior
assumes such distinctions exists by reasons of their choosing
his rating rn is 1640 though?
Still higher than yours