chess.com is unfair

Sort:
Avatar of Shanomac19

Umm... this is the literal definition of a stalemate sorry to break it to you. 

 

Avatar of Shanomac19

Stalemate is : the king is not in check but can make no legal moves without moving into check.

 

Avatar of ZonClips

another problem.\

Website thinks putting a 442 rating against a 376 is fair bro????? ofc i lost like how is that fair man

Avatar of idilis
ZonClips wrote:

another problem.\

Website thinks putting a 442 rating against a 376 is fair bro????? ofc i lost like how is that fair man

https://www.chess.com/settings/live

Did you set your incoming/outgoing rating ranges?

Avatar of sakkmarton
acaciachesss wrote:

i clearly won here then a stalemate popped up like bro??????? this was agesnt a bot btw

stalemate draw

Avatar of idilis
sakkmarton wrote:
acaciachesss wrote:

i clearly won here then a stalemate popped up like bro??????? this was agesnt a bot btw

stalemate draw

That's telling him! 1 year late though ,since he's been online.

Avatar of FoxWithNekoEars
Uživatel ZonClips napsal:

another problem.\

Website thinks putting a 442 rating against a 376 is fair bro????? ofc i lost like how is that fair man

that's not a big rating difference at all...

Avatar of jetoba
FoxWithNekoEars wrote:
Uživatel ZonClips napsal:

another problem.\

Website thinks putting a 442 rating against a 376 is fair bro????? ofc i lost like how is that fair man

that's not a big rating difference at all...

If somebody is going to resurrect an old thread then it may as well be repurposed.  Over the decades I've dealt with a lot of parents that think it is unfair for their 376 child to be paired against a 442 and who also think it is very fair for their 442 child to be paired against a 376.

Avatar of EscherehcsE

I think it's a case of stolemate...