Chess.com, please ban veryverystern.
when you can’t beat someone in an argument, you ask for him to be banned ?
that’s hardly fair.
I've talked to this Stern guy before, he dodges most arguments that he can't counter. Also, when i provide like rebuttal against his argument in a now deleted thread, he blocked me. So, stern ain't a good at arguments.
Cool, you are much more up to speed on things than me.
https://www.chess.com/forum/view/site-feedback/chess-com-you-need-to-put-me-in-charge-111252102?page=1
You see, he wants to get rid of half the moderators. He wants to restrict beginners and also under 15s. Half the chess.com community is 15 under. 65% are beginners. This is ridiculous and you have to ban him.
I would ban people that takes him seriously and makes a case out of this insignicant and totally non-threating issue
Just so you know, your close friend Big-Macca tried the same "messaging mods" tactic to get me banned. It backfired, and now he’s the one who’s banned. (I see you and him over at reddit crying over it)
End quote
Lol he thinks he’s so superior. I don’t think what he said is even true lol
"You agree to not use the Services to [...] make available any Content that is [...] objectionable [...]" (Chess.com User Agreement, 4-C)
"objectionable (adjective) arousing distaste or opposition; unpleasant or offensive" (New Oxford American Dictionary)
I'm no legal expert, nor do I know how to properly quote, but I do believe veryverystern is indeed breaking the Terms.
i disagree, just because 1 person finds it objectionable shouldn't mean it is.
i find what he's posting to be fine.
when you can’t beat someone in an argument, you ask for him to be banned ?
that’s hardly fair.
I've talked to this Stern guy before, he dodges most arguments that he can't counter. Also, when i provide like rebuttal against his argument in a now deleted thread, he blocked me. So, stern ain't a good at arguments.
same here