Chess.com rating estimates are way way off

Sort:
Dan-likes-clocks-2

Mysterious Benedict sociaty*

Dan-likes-clocks-2

I'm under the age of 18 so I want to part time chess player

Dan-likes-clocks-2

For fun

Dan-likes-clocks-2

Under the age of 28*

Sololevelingsirjohn

Too much cheating here especially in blitz 900 to 1000, full of sandbaggers, stock fish phone users or outside help group play, its very annoying and makes playing online nearly pointless. I certainly wouldn't pay to be beaten by one of these kind, oh don't forget the people who are down 10 points that notice your down 5 seconds and just pre move anywhere to beat you on time cause they can't do it on skill. By the time you see all this its probly better for your health to just take a hammer and smack your hand with then play online and likely less aggravating to imo.

OnuragChess
manudude02 wrote:
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:

Everything in this site is way off. Their ratings are extremely overinflated. Why do 2400s hang their pieces so often?

Even Super GMs have hung pieces, sometimes it's easy to miss something is hanging when you are trying to attack.
I feel like the reasons they blunder is because they're think they're too good and they just dont care or they just panic and cause to blunder more often times.

Cloudy_Craft1256

the only time i used an outside source was when i tried a new opening, then they played it wrong and i lost in game 💀