After posting I played another game.
This 1800 blunders a piece, rook, and more. What the hell. Is this 1800 or 1000?
Chess.com Ratings
Sort:
Jun 4, 2019
0
#5
You are likely underrated for the pool of players. Stronger play can induce errors. If you keep beating 1800's you're probabably closer to 2000-2100 strength in the blitz rating pool. 
0
#6
Martin_Stahl wrote:
You are likely underrated for the pool of players. Stronger play can induce errors. If you keep beating 1800's you're probabably closer to 2000-2100 strength in the blitz rating pool.
No no no, that's far too logical. I'm trying to be an arrogant prick here and you're ruining it.
The correct response is either hating me or loving me. Either way it's a strong reaction, meaning more attention... but a dispassionate explanation just deflates my balloon 
Stop bragging. I can say 99% sure , it is mouse slip. His plan must be Rh3.
Mouse slips happens to everyone, regardless of ratings.
0
#8
drmrboss wrote:
Stop bragging. I can say 99% sure , it is mouse slip. His plan must be Rh3.
Mouse slips happens to everyone, regardless of ratings.
Oh, so maybe he was trying to lose a rook in a different way?
0
#9
DamonevicSmithlov wrote:
Keep bragging. We love it.
I'm the best at bragging, and everyone knows it.
0
#10
It's mouse slip and I bet you couldn't beat me I'm not afraid with your phony rating. LOL
mariners234 wrote:
drmrboss wrote:
Stop bragging. I can say 99% sure , it is mouse slip. His plan must be Rh3.
Mouse slips happens to everyone, regardless of ratings.
Oh, so maybe he was trying to lose a rook in a different way?
Do you really expect your opponent will play like that?
Then good luck with your "Candidate moves"
He will most likely do (Reh8) first!!, then Rxg3.
There were blunders by your opponents, but I cant judge him without knowing "his reminaing time".
23....... Nxg4??
If I have <10 seconds, I will likely do trash move like that!
If I get about 1 min, I can figure out the important squares in the position. For example, in this position, the light square diagonal is dangerous. Instead of OP moves, I will block light square diagonal with his own pawn , e.g "d5, cxd5 , Qxd5 "
Jun 4, 2019
0
#14
Fixedthx wrote:
You know, because 40 game win streaks aren't at all suspicious, nor is a baby brained puke focused on all the wrong things about chess. Guy is twelve years old, Martin, stop wringing your hands and believing all you read, so sad.
Started with a 1600 rating, average opponent of 1563. If I'm correct on the player's actual strength within the blitz pool, then a 2000-2100 strength player will likely have similar results until more games are played with some higher rated players.
If you feel something is not kosher, please report it through the proper channels.
edit: glad I quoted, though the other post being gone makes my post a little weird 
Jun 4, 2019
0
#15
Fixedthx wrote:
Look the other way peacekeeper, honesty is to brutal for you.
Again, if you feel something is off, report it through a ticket, report on the profile, not in the forums.
Jun 4, 2019
0
#17
Fixedthx wrote:
When someone is accustomed to winning, they behave as though they been there before. Not this b.s. you guys are lazy in your "research" and so asleep.
Ghost posting ... is this a new thing?
Jun 4, 2019
0
#18
Fixedthx wrote:
Rather report you 4 incompetence
Feel free, if you feel that is worth the effort. 
0
#19
Geodesist216 wrote:
It's mouse slip and I bet you couldn't beat me I'm not afraid with your phony rating. LOL
Lets talk about phony ratings Mr sandbagger.
I believe chess.com bans accounts for this
Please Sign Up to comment.
If you need help, please contact our Help and Support team.
This guy @mojodragoncaster was 1800 when I played him in 3|0 but I won only using 1 minute?
I'm not a GM, so this shouldn't be possible. Why was he so bad?
Earlier it was this 1700 guy @chessrooklift. I lost 3 points of material in the opening, but I was so sure of the win I told him on move 30 to at least make me use a minute before he lost (which made him speed up, thankfully, but he still lost).